GENERAL COMMENTS • Defining compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as transition phase fuels and limiting infrastructure commitments only to LNG and until 1 January 2025 may result in a time-limited support for these technologies and hamper the development not only of the bioLNG and bioCNG sector, but also projects developed for mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas.
PGNiG S.A.
Company · Poland · EU Transparency Register 70816716119-36not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 2 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track PGNiG in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at PGNiG S.A.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
PGNiG S.A. filed 5 positions between 4 May 2020 and 15 Apr 2022, across 3 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
GENERAL COMMENTS • Currently, transport sector accounts for a quarter of the UE’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and this value continues to grow. • Natural gas (LNG/CNG) powered vehicles reduce GHG emissions of approximately 20-22% (sum of CO2, CH4 and N2O) and produce three times less NOx compared to gasoline or diesel vehicles. LNG-fuelled ships emit up to 100% less PM, up to 80% less NOX and up to 100% less SOX.
• Taking into account stringent obligations set out in Regulation, it is reasonable to set a 5 years deadline for full implementation the provisions of Regulation. • The „measurement” term should be replaced with „quantification” throughout the text of the regulation in order to allow additional instruments for better estimation of methane emissions. • The proposed term "component" in Article 2(8) is not defined.
GENERAL COMMENTS • EU legislation may lead to increased revenues, but also significant costs, for energy companies. However, to assess that, precise cost analyses must be conducted. Cost-efficiency should be at the heart of any policy planning. • All measures related to the reduction of methane emissions should be reasonable but not overly prescriptive to avoid excessive financial and technical burdens.
Acknowledging growing concerns about the distortions caused by foreign subsidies within the Internal Market, the initiative undertaken by the Commission to present proposal of regulation in order to address these interventions generally and also in the specific cases of acquisitions and public procurement is highly welcomed.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put PGNiG S.A. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 26.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from PGNiG S.A.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.