Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
NAC

Netherlands Aerospace Centre

Academic / research · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 569198415707-56

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 126 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #64 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Think tanks and research institutions
Head office
Amsterdam, Netherlands

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Netherlands in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Netherlands Aerospace Centre? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Netherlands Aerospace Centre engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Netherlands Aerospace Centre or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Netherlands Aerospace Centre filed 2 positions between 22 May 2025 and 21 May 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

European strategy on research and technology infrastructuresfiled 22 May 2025PDFsource

Research Infrastructures (RIs) and Technology Infrastructures (TIs) are a core asset for European research, strategic autonomy and competitiveness. A dedicated supporting strategy for Tis is still is at the beginning, whilst the EC has widely supported RIs. We suggest keeping a separation of these RI and TI strategies, because of their different maturity levels.

EU aviation strategyfiled 21 May 2026PDFsource

NLR recommends the following actions 1. Strengthen aviation research & technology infrastructures (RTIs) Europes future competitiveness and sovereignty depend heavily on world-class RTIs. The future strategy should support the long-term renewal and maintenance of strategic aviation testing and validation infrastructures, including windtunnels, propulsion, digital, ATM and autonomous aviation environments. 2.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Netherlands Aerospace Centre’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.