We welcome the European Commissions initiative to revise the Aviation Strategy and appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation process. From our perspective, the following aspects should be taken into consideration during the revision process. 1.
GLVI
Company · Germany
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track GLVI in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at GLVI? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
GLVI filed 2 positions between 21 May 2026 and 28 May 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
We welcome the fact that UAS and U-space are to be included in the regulation. However, we would like to highlight a few points that require revision. Annex V, Chapter 1.7, 2.6, 3.6: (3) Encounter of unmanned aircraft while transiting in U-space airspace. It is unclear how the word encounter is to be understood in this context.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put GLVI next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from GLVI’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.