Finnish Information Security Cluster (FISC), representing cybersecurity industry that is operating in and from Finland, supports the outlined objectives for the revision of public procurement directives. Public procurement constitutes significant economic resources, which can be harnessed in strategic manner to foster development and deployment of critical technologies, as well as security of supply chains and…
FIS
Finnish Information Security Cluster (FISC)
Industry association · Finland · EU Transparency Register 850004435583-28
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #548 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2019
in the register since
Declares membership of
- European Cybersecurity Organization (ECSO)
- Digital Europe →
- Orgalim →
- Business Europe →
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Finnish Information Security Cluster – Kyberala ry (FISC)
- Head office
- Helsinki, Finland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Finnish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Finnish Information Security Cluster (FISC)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Finnish Information Security Cluster (FISC) filed 3 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 13 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
ENISAs mandate needs to be critically assessed, focusing its tasks on areas where it can provide the most European value added that member states cannot achieve independently. It has far too many tasks in its mandate (even approx. 80 various tasks) and there is a need to significantly reduce them.
S.4.3: System configuration using limited capability language does not change the cybersecurity risk position of the entire system. Using a limited capability language for PLC configuration or programming does not change the cybersecurity risk position of the entire system when the capabilities of the language do not allow it to affect the original products compliance with the essential cybersecurity requirements or…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- DIGITALEUROPE · 3 files in common
- AMETIC · 3 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 2 files in common
- Bitkom e.V. · 2 files in common
- Danish Industry · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 58.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Finnish Information Security Cluster (FISC)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.