DIN - the German national standards body representing about 37,000 experts within the European standardization system - welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on the Circular Economy Act (CEA). Standards are a key enabler of the CEA.
DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.
Other · Germany · EU Transparency Register 989808524267-58
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #27 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- CEN European Committee for Standardization
- ISO International Organization for Standardization
- COPANT Pan American Standards Commission
- American Chamber of Commerce in Germany e.V.
- AWV Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Wirtschaft und Verwaltung e.V.
- BITKOM e.V. →
- BUJ Bundesverband der Unternehmensjuristen e.V.
- Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Sicherheit und Gesundheit
- bei der Arbeit
- Bundesverband Baustoffe - Steine und Erden e.V.
- BVBS Bundesverband Bausoftware e.V.
- DVW Deutsche Verkehrswacht e.V.
- and 2 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Head office
- Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track DIN in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. filed 4 positions between 6 Nov 2025 and 12 Aug 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
Attached you will find the co-authored position of ASI - Austrian Standards International, DIN - the German Institute for Standardization, and DKE - German Commission for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies regarding the call for evidence on the European Open Digital Ecosystem Strategy.
DIN is the national standardisation body of Germany. As such we would like to recommend certain changes to the CSA2 draft, that allow it to achieve its aims while avoiding certain negative implications. Particularly, we recommend three things: Firstly, to advance the process of European standards development instead of creating a parallel standard setting system.
DIN, the German Institute for Standardization, welcomes the European Commission's initiative to establish ecodesign requirements for iron and steel products under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). European standardization should play a central role in implementing the delegated act.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bitkom e.V. · 3 files in common
- Danish Chamber of Commerce · 3 files in common
- Confederation of Swedish Enterprise · 3 files in common
- U.Di.Con. APS UNIONE PER LA DIFESA DEI CONSUMATORI · 3 files in common
- MedTech Europe · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 76.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.