Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The position of the Swedish Consumer Agency is expressed in the attached file, and can be summarised as follows: The Swedish Consumer Agency agrees that an effective system for alternative dispute resolution is important to achieve a well-functioning Single Market. Consumers are shopping across the borders which means that such system also has to function in cases of cross-border disputes.
Ecommerce Europe welcomes the opportunity to provide additional input for the Commissions evaluation process. Overall, we consider that the Directive has successfully created a standard for EU-wide out-of-court commercial dispute resolution mechanisms. Wide-spread infringements have been better tackled thanks to an enhanced cooperation among EU public authorities.
Ecommerce Europe welcomes the opportunity to provide additional input to the Commission on the revision of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) framework. We consider that there is room for improvement in the Commission proposal to alleviate unintended negative consequences (e.g. scope), improve trader participation in ADR schemes and ultimately facilitate better consumer protection.
Ecommerce Europe welcomes the opportunity to provide additional input to the Commission on the revision of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) framework. We consider that there is room for improvement in the Commission proposal to alleviate unintended negative consequences (e.g. scope), improve trader participation in ADR schemes and ultimately facilitate better consumer protection.
The Swedish Consumer Agency welcomes a targeted revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 on consumer protection cooperation (CPC Regulation). Overall the Regulation provides for a solid legal basis for effective cross-border consumer protection cooperation.
Ecommerce Europe welcomes the opportunity to provide additional input for the Commissions evaluation process on the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Regulation (EU) 2017/239. We appreciate the CPC Regulation as it stimulates competent national authorities to cooperate on consumer protection actions and the enforcement of EU consumer law, especially in cross-border cases.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.