Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
1.2
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2015

34
files engaged
of 583 tracked
36
positions filed
in those 583 files
28.5
declared FTE
self-declared
16
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated act · Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated act

Nuclear Transparency Watch · filed 26 Nov 2025 · source

Nuclear Transparency Watch calls on the European Commission to: 1 - Exclude nuclear energy from the EU Taxonomy due to its unsustainable and high-risk nature. 2 - Strengthen transparency by requiring verifiable, science-based evidence for all technical screening criteria. 3 - Enforce compliance with EU and Euratom laws on nuclear safety, waste management, and public participation.

WWF European Policy Office · filed 5 Dec 2025 · source

We welcome the Commissions initiative to review the EU Taxonomy Climate and Environmental Delegated Acts to improve clarity, usability, and cost-effectiveness. However, we express significant concern regarding the proposed process and the implications of simplification. 1.

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention

Nuclear Transparency Watch · filed 3 Apr 2020 · source

Nuclear Transparency Watch is a European network of NGOs whose goal is to increase nuclear safety by supporting access to justice and access to information. NTW welcomes the Commission’s efforts to address the findings of EU non-compliance with the Convention by amending the Regulation with suitable measures.

WWF European Policy Office · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Delivery of the European Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver on their commitments. Presently, there are no effective means for the public to seek judicial review of EU acts that breach environmental law.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.