Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

NOR
Northvolt

Company · Sweden

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
TE
49
files engaged
of 583 tracked
59
positions filed
in those 583 files
21.7
declared FTE
self-declared
26
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Batteries and waste batteries · Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteries

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Batteries and waste batteries

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Jul 2020 · source

Lithium-ion batteries will be the backbone of the economy’s decarbonisation, notably the EU transport. Unlike combustion engines that burn oil and release harmful emissions, batteries can be reused and recycled at the end of their lives. Batteries are the best technology we have today to make our road transport emissions-free.

Northvolt · filed 3 Jul 2020 · source

That there is a need for a revised battery directive and new regulation to fully benefit from the potential of a growing battery industry is evident. Northvolt would like to underline a few points regarding the inception impact assessment in order to have the new regulation in place as timely and effectively as possible. The full feedback will be submitted as attached file.

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Mar 2021 · source

This submission is made on behalf of four European NGOs: ECOS, EEB (The European Environmental Bureau), Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH – Environmental Action Germany, and Transport & Environment, all with an interest in the development of an environmentally sustainable battery value chain in Europe.

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteries

Transport & Environment · filed 24 May 2024 · source

T&E welcomes the Commissions draft act on the methodology for calculating the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries. Prioritising direct connection to renewable energy, thus rewarding clean manufacturing, and opting for a battery approach for the functional unit are key principles and should be kept.

Northvolt · filed 28 May 2024 · source

Northvolt welcomes the European Commissions carbon footprint methodology for batteries for electric vehicles in its current form, as a balanced compromise between different policy considerations. It is important and urgent to have a framework set in the immediate term, both for the sake of regulatory certainty for industry and for the sake of transparency on the carbon intensity of production to ensure a sustainable…

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.