Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The City of Stockholm has high ambitions in the field of environment and climate action. The city’s budget, environmental programmes and climate action plan stress the need to reduce consumption-based emissions, in particular from construction, food, IT equipment and textiles. The aim is not only to reduce own emissions, but also to contribute to the sustainable use of resources and circular flows.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG (RESPONSIBLE UNIT) Circular Economy Act DG ENV B3 (‘From Waste to Resources’) and DG GROW I4 (‘Sustainable Products Comments from Ministry of the Environment in Finland Finland appreciates the EU’s aim to use circular economy to boost the EU’s economic security, resilience, competitiveness and decarbonisation.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Digitalisation can bring about increased efficiency and productivity. Good data management is a prerequisite to bring about this change. The City of Stockholm welcomes the EU:s high ambitions concerning the digital transition and acknowledges that there is an added value of availability of public datasets.
The goal of the regulation is excellent and it is compact. This regulation has much in common with the existing national regulation. It is good to have the similar common regulation in the whole EU. Free access to the open data could be beneficial many more parties and could create more innovations with increased efficiency and productivity. If the data has price in it, it only benefits those who are able to pay.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.
