Okta (Transparency Register number 985910748406-44), the leading global identity and access management company, welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed regulation for an EU Interoperable Europe Act. Please find our comments in the attached paper.
EU consultation · Commission Proposal
European Interoperability Framework (EIF) evaluation and EU governments interoperability strategy
12 submissions from 12 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 115 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 12 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
3 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 16 Jan 2023 — it ran from 18 Nov 2022.
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Legislative stage
- Commission Proposal
- Commission reference
- COM(2022)710
How it got here
- Impact assess incep12 Nov 2020
- Public consultation26 Apr 2021
- Proposal for a regulation16 Jan 2023
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communication.
Showing 12 of 12 submissions.
Eurocities
· · filed 16 Jan 2023 · source
Local authorities recognise the value of the interoperability of network and information systems as an important enabler of scaled advantages for better (digital) public services in Europe. The proposal by the Commission contains promising support measures in favour of improved cross-border interoperability.
Interoperability is a cornerstone of a well-functioning single market and European data economy. The European Interoperability Framework (EIF) plays a key role in advancing interoperability by drawing attention to all four layers of interoperability (legal, organisational, semantic, technical) and making recommendations from that starting point.
The City of Stockholm welcomes the European Commissions proposal for an Interoperable Europe Act, but also shares the concerns raised by SALAR/ SKR (as attached) regarding the proposals implementation at local level. Particularly so in regards to the perceived lack of clarity on the proposals subject matter, i.e.
The feedback of The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) is summarized in attached appendix. SALAR is overall positive to the regulation where the benefits are obvious and, in the long term, gains the citizens and organisations within the inner market.
As we wrote last year in https://cnll.fr/media/ReponseCNLLconsultation__PacteProductifNumerique2019_Final.pdf or 8 years ago in https://cnll.fr/media/propositions_cnll_fleurpellerin.pdf we consider it essential to define and implement a European interoperability policy, in particular in order to enable businesses to interact with the information systems of the administrations (including at events such as trivial but…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
OpenForum Europe
· · filed 12 Nov 2020 · source
To support the upcoming evaluation of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF), OpenForum Europe (OFE) is glad to contribute suggestions to improve this successful policy instrument. The EIF is a highly relevant policy instrument providing the basis for interoperable, cross-border services, making a real world impact for citizens.
INATBA - International Association for Trusted Blockchain Applications
· · filed 12 Nov 2020 · source
The Interoperability Working Group of INATBA gathers expertise from a diverse range of stakeholders, which welcome the revision and evaluation of the EIF and under the broader scope of the ISA2 Programme. Interoperability has never been as important as during this worldwide pandemic. The EIF is essential in providing the right instruments for blockchain to be an enabler during the current digital revolution.
Free Software Foundation Europe e.V.
· · filed 12 Nov 2020 · source
To ensure the interoperability of public services in the EU it is key to strengthen open standards and Free Software. Citizens demand more and more open, efficient, borderless, interoperable solutions. Also they ask for user-friendly, personalized solutions being trustworthy, (E2EE) secure and respecting fundamental rights, like the right to privacy.
Digital Transformation Department - Presidency of the Council of Ministries
· · filed 12 Nov 2020 · source
Interoperability is essential to establish a consistent, sustainable, and trustworthy European ecosystem for cross-border digital services which includes citizens and the private sector; a retrospective on the current EIF is then important.
Challenges: In the various European countries there is a different speed of enforcement of eGovernment. These dif-ferences are related to general security concerns in digitalisation. Many citizens do not have so often to contact authorities for that digitalisation of public infrastructure can offer them a real advantage.
Hellenic OCR Team
· · filed 21 Oct 2020 · source
In view of the rapid development of tools and services built around (linked) open government data, the evaluation of the European interoperability framework (EIF) and of the much broader ISA2 programme is both timely and important. The Hellenic OCR Team, which is designing methods and building tools for the processing and analysis of public data, sees there a broad field for the democratization of public knowledge.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.