Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
DECO welcome this proposal. General comments: Acknowledging the objective of promotion of a data driven economy, it is important that there is a regulatory framework to establish the rules by which data sharing happens. This is particularly relevant for financial data as it entails sensitive information of natural persons and firms.
IPF hopes that the FIDA proposal will help to further level the playing field between bank and non-bank payment providers, as well as modernise and enhance the resilience and competitiveness of the payment sector.
DECO welcome this proposal. We consider the PSD2 needs to be profoundly revised especially regarding fraud, liability and redress. General comments: The proposals to address consumer/user confidence by enhancing their protection are very much welcome.
IPF hopes that the proposals will help to further level the playing field between bank and non-bank payment providers, as well as modernise and enhance the resilience and competitiveness of the payment sector. For the upcoming legislative procedure, IPF urges lawmakers in the European Parliament and the Council to use the revision of PSD2 as an opportunity to avoid excessive requirements and increased bureaucracy.
DECO welcome this proposal. It is essential to have a thorough review of the PSD2. We agree with the conclusion of the impact assessment regarding consumers' at risk of fraud. COMMENTS Scope (Articles 1 and 2 and Recitals 13 and 68) The proposal for a Directive on licensing and supervision of payment institutions is largely based on Title II of PSD2, regarding Payment Service Providers, which only applies to payment…
IPF hopes that the proposals will help to further level the playing field between bank and non-bank payment providers, as well as modernise and enhance the resilience and competitiveness of the payment sector. For the upcoming legislative procedure, IPF urges lawmakers in the European Parliament and the Council to use the revision of PSD2 as an opportunity to avoid excessive requirements and increased bureaucracy.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.