Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

FIO
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

Academic / research · Finland

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
24
files engaged
of 583 tracked
25
positions filed
in those 583 files
6.8
declared FTE
self-declared
19
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €900K+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates · Protection of workers from asbestos

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source

HBM4EU is a joint effort of 28 countries, the European Environment Agency and the European Commission, co-funded under Horizon 2020. The initiative is coordinating and advancing human biomonitoring (HBM) in Europe. HBM4EU is generating evidence of the actual exposure of citizens to chemicals and the possible health effects in order to support policy making.

European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source

Lead and lead compounds are important substances for battery production and recycling, manufacture of lead oxides, glass and ceramics. These substances are hazardous for both human health and the environment. They are currently classified under the CLP regulation with a harmonised classification as substances toxic for reproduction in humans (Reproduction category 1A) and are covered under the CAD with outdated…

Protection of workers from asbestos

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source

When revising the asbestos OEL it is of outmost importance to specify the width of fibres the OEL relates to. The RAC opinion clearly states that also thinner (<0.2 µm) fibres are carcinogenic and should be considered when measuring asbestos exposure.

European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source

ETUC fully supports Commission’s intention to improve the Asbestos at Work Directive by reviewing the binding limit value for asbestos. Asbestos is still present in many European buildings and bedrock in mines, and is a significant health and safety threat for millions of European workers.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.