Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Overview T&E supports the introduction of a mandate for specific sustainable advanced fuels in the aviation sector, but only if certain conditions are met for such a mandate to provide both a clear environmental benefit and investor certainty.
Dear Madam or Sir, Please find attached T&E's position paper on the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation, which includes our recommendations for SAF targets. We believe that the text has a solid basis, especially when it comes to its scope applying to all departing flights and its exclusion of food and feed crop-based biofuels.
Comments on Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport The Context of the Proposal mentions that “For sustainability reasons, first generation biofuels such as crop-based biofuels Feed, and food and crop-based biofuels, which have limited scalability potential and raise sustainability concerns, should not be supported.”…
We welcome the EC initiative to develop an effective EU regulation to drive the uptake of sustainable alternative fuels in EU shipping. We agree with the EC assessment that creating a predictable demand in the shipping industry is essential for the investment and mass scale deployment of sustainable alternative fuels.
Comments to the whereas, in numeral 12: It is important to note that in Colombia, the oil palm that has been generically classified as causing ILUC, has not produced deforestation, nor does it indirectly produce the use of land with high carbon stocks. In Colombia, several studies have shown that oil palm development has not been a major driver for deforestation.
Comments to the whereas, in numeral 12: It is important to note that in Colombia, the oil palm that has been generically classified as causing ILUC, has not produced deforestation, nor does it indirectly produce the use of land with high carbon stocks.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.