Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
ZVEI welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the European Commission's Inception Impact Assessment on adapting liability rules to the digital age and artificial intelligence (AI). From a ZVEI point of view there is currently no reason for a fundamental revision of the Product Liability Directive (PLD) or the introduction of a new horizontal legislation on liability for AI.
The Italian Association of Young Lawyers has the honour to take part in the debate on product liability in order to supplement and/or repeal the current European Directive 85/374/EEC. First, the definition of a defective product (in Article 6 of the proposal) appears to be generic, since it does not provide objective parameters for the assessment, or the reference to point (h) of that article.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
AIGA, the Italian Association of Young Lawyers, has always been particularly positive and interested in the technological development of the application of Artistic Intelligence, taking care to play an active role in stimulating the legal debate surrounding it, in order to ensure legal certainty and at the same time encourage the wider use of this instrument.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
With reference to our statement from July 2021 on the Inception Impact Assessment and our position paper "Liability for AI" from May 2021 submitted in this context, we maintain the position that, in view of the existing technology-neutral and comprehensively applicable product safety and liability law, there are no relevant liability gaps for potential damage caused by AI applications and systems and thus no need…
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.