2023/0093(COD) · In Force
6 submissions from 6 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 40 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 6 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
2 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 2 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 15 Jun 2023 — it ran from 10 Apr 2023.
How it got here
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.
Showing 6 of 6 submissions.
Italian Young Lawyers (Aiga) welcomes the text of the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transfer of criminal proceedings, which aims to harmonise the system of transfers of cases and speed them up, on the basis of the principles nullum crimen, nulla poena sine Prior lege and proportionality between the loffesa of the offence, which belong to European legal culture and…
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Dear Sir or Madam, please find attached the German Bar Association's Position Paper on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transfer of proceedings in criminal matters COM(2023) 185 final. Kind regards [name removed]
The Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. — Victim Support Institution reports in annex on the experience of judicial cooperation. The creation of an EU legal framework is highly appreciated. The effectiveness, efficiency and legal certainty for victims is welcomed. We would like to thank you very much for the good efforts and offer our experience and skills and are happy to contribute to the creation of future solutions.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Cross-border crimes remain noteworthy with certain forms, such as cybercrime, rapidly increasing. Coupled with mobility within the EU, the level of cross border victimisation is likely to increase in the future, making decisions on jurisdiction ever more important for victims.
· · filed 14 Dec 2021 · source
The Latvian courts support the objective of the initiative to establish common rules to facilitate the transfer of criminal proceedings between the competent authorities of the Member States, pointing out that, prima facie, this framework could be best achieved through option 3.
Filed in Latvian · English published by the European Commission
· · filed 16 Nov 2021 · source
Already on 30 November 2009, the Council of the European Union approved Framework Decision 2009/948/GAI on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings, with the aim of preventing possible infringements of the ne bis in idem principle by encouraging closer cooperation between the competent authorities of two or more Member States following certain criminal proceedings.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.