Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ARN
Alliance Renault Nissan

Company · Belgium

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
TE
49
files engaged
of 583 tracked
59
positions filed
in those 583 files
21.7
declared FTE
self-declared
26
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Batteries and waste batteries · Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Batteries and waste batteries

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Jul 2020 · source

Lithium-ion batteries will be the backbone of the economy’s decarbonisation, notably the EU transport. Unlike combustion engines that burn oil and release harmful emissions, batteries can be reused and recycled at the end of their lives. Batteries are the best technology we have today to make our road transport emissions-free.

Alliance Renault Nissan · filed 9 Jul 2020 · source

Alliance Renault Nissan welcomes the opportunity to comment on the IIA on modernizing the EU’s Battery legislation and support more circularity and sustainability. We strongly believe that batteries are essential for the transport decarbonisation and proper attention to its development is key for the future of our automotive industry. ELV Directive already apply to batteries used in cars.

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Mar 2021 · source

This submission is made on behalf of four European NGOs: ECOS, EEB (The European Environmental Bureau), Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH – Environmental Action Germany, and Transport & Environment, all with an interest in the development of an environmentally sustainable battery value chain in Europe.

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

Transport & Environment · filed 29 Apr 2020 · source

The EU urgently needs a new and robust legislative framework on zero emission infrastructure to support the 33-44 million electric cars (battery and plug-in hybrid) expected on the road in 2030 to align with transport decarbonisation goals. Consumers should have access to the EU single market for chargers.

Alliance Renault Nissan · filed 4 May 2020 · source

As the pioneer and global leader in zero-emission electric vehicles, the Alliance Renault-Nissan welcomes the revision of the Directive 2014/94/EU. It supports and recognizes the priorities flagged by the European Commission for this Initial Impact Assessment. It agrees the primary problem is an insufficient amount and coverage of charging stations.

Transport & Environment · filed 18 Nov 2021 · source

Transport & Environment (T&E) welcomes the Commission’s (EC) proposal for a regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. In particular the change of the legislative instrument from directive to a regulation T&E considers an important step in the right direction. (detailed feedback in attachment).

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.