Industry association · Lithuania
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 655 consultation files tracked so far (56,999 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track CLL in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CLL? so we know who speaks for it.
CLL filed 3 positions between 30 Jan 2025 and 28 Sept 2026, across 2 of the 655 legislative files tracked here.
The current regulation of GMOs should not be the basis for the assessment of NGT 2, as GMOs are based on precautionary historical doubts and do not reflect scientific progress and experience with GM crops in recent years. Moreover, those regulations do not provide any flexibility to cover the wide range of properties and the various risk profiles expected from NGT 2 plants.
Filed in Lithuanian · English published by the European Commission
The delegated acts for gene scissors (New Genomic Technologies) should ensure an enabling environment for innovation, be practicable and avoid MS creating barriers or additional national requirements for NGT1 plants. Guidance documents and delegated acts should ensure flexibility and be future-oriented and not create unnecessary barriers to technology.
Filed in Lithuanian · English published by the European Commission
We broadly support the concept of a digital label (not electronic but digital) and, in particular, the application of this requirement to newly authorised plant protection products, but we believe that a reasonable transitional period should be granted for the implementation of this requirement. Article 4 and Annex VI of the draft Regulation contain a requirement for products to be labelled with a colour scheme.
Filed in Lithuanian · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put CLL next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 7.
Everything on this page comes from CLL’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.