2026/0265(COD) · Commission Proposal
508 submissions from 479 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission received 746 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 508 from organizations. Not shown: 96 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 142 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →
283 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 94 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.0 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice. An identical text filed by several organizations counts once: 3 submissions here repeat 3 texts word for word and are folded into them.
What the room declares
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.
The file, right now
The consultation is open — 56 days left to submit. It closes on 10 Nov 2026.
Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.
How it got here
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.
Showing 8 of 8 submissions on this page · page 3 of 3 · 508 across the file. Search the whole file
We are a central purchasing body for, among other things, school administrations and we represent their interests. A number of concerns about Directive 2014/24: Could there be more attention to smaller procurers with a private legal form? They are not classic public authorities and lack budget, staff and time to meet the many public procurement obligations.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
The main need for the amendment of the Public Procurement Directives is simplification of the rules and greater speed in procurement. On the other hand, it is necessary to limit the action of own resources. In forestry, they remove more than 50 % of the market. They also absorb a high percentage of the EAFRD Fund. Their action would have to be fully restrictive for emergencies or when the market cannot respond.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
We believe Open Source provides solutions to many of the problems the Union faces today, allowing Europe to build independent, interoperable, sovereign solutions that benefit from global expertise at a lower price and with more benefit to wider society. In short, Open Source enables sovereignty without isolationism. Please see our attached feedback document.
· · filed 12 Nov 2025 · source
1. Digital Transformation & Data-Driven Procurement Mandatory e-Procurement and Interoperability: Future procurement systems should leverage structured data standards (eForms) and ensure interoperability across platforms. Linking procurement data with beneficial ownership, tax, and spending datasets will enable advanced analytics and AI-driven risk detection.
· · filed 12 Nov 2025 · source
Need for a clearer definition of innovation in the context of public procurement. Currently, the interpretation of "innovation" in public procurement varies significantly across EU Member States, which hampers the comparability of innovative procurement indicators and practices. In some countries, only entirely new or substantially improved products, services, or processes are considered innovative.
The Stockholm Region is responsible for healthcare, public transport and regional development in Stockholm County. The mission also includes contributing to cultural life. Since the last revision of the EU public procurement directives, among other things, the pandemic and the changing external environment have had a major impact on public purchases.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Transparency, clear rules, effective controls would be desirable. Fair trade definitions that do not favour brands or labels, in particular to ensure that those to be protected and promoted are not discriminated against by claims in terms of terms of reference.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Title: Enhancing transparency and strategic autonomy in EU procurement of communication and webhosting services. These services underpin the Unions digital sovereignty, institutional visibility and information security. They are no longer routine technical contracts but critical components of Europes strategic autonomy and resilience.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.