Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Evaluation of EU rules for users of genetic resources and the sharing of benefits arising from their utilization

41 submissions from 41 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 50 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 41 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

15 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 4 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.8 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 15Civil society 4Public authorities, academia, other 22

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

14 of 41
in the EU Register
55
full-time lobbying staff
€9.0M+
declared costs a year
23
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 11 Feb 2026 — it ran from 14 Jan 2026.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
In planning
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2027 · in 213 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · evaluation11 Feb 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.

41 positions · showing 25

CU

Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

Dear Madam or Sir, I would like to provide my opinion on implementation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 under the Nagoya Protocol. EU made a great effort to clarify the obligations resulting from the Nagoya Protocol and the procedures to be taken to comply with the Regulation.

LinkedInX
C

CIRAD

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

The European regulation has succeeded in its objective in that it has made it possible to deconsolidate the need for compliance on the part of European users. It leads them to be more vigilant about the utilisation of genetic resources and compliance with national regulations of countries party to the Nagoya Protocol. The Regulation makes it essential to exercise due diligence in the context of a research project.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CI

CropLife International

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

CropLife International welcomes the ability to contribute to the European Commissions consultation on the EU Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) Regulation. Secured access to and use of genetic resources by CropLife member companies is of paramount importance to ensure the continued development of innovative technologies that enable farmers to sustainably increase productivity and safeguard food security.

LinkedInX
IB

International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association (IBMA)

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

IBMA has shared the survey with its members, who will provide the requested information (deadline set by ENV: 28 February). Regarding the general Call for Evidence, IBMA understands that the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and the respective EU legislation is primarily targeted at Member States.

LinkedInX
IF

International Fragrance Association (IFRA)

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) welcomes the European Commissions evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) and appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to this important review.

LinkedInX

The European Marine Biological Resource Centre (EMBRC-ERIC) is a European Research Infrastructure (RI) which promotes marine research in Europe, supporting ABS due diligence and the sustainable use of marine genetic resources (MGR).

LinkedInX
EA

EFfCI AISBL

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

EFfCI is the European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients, a trade association that brings together European manufacturers of synthetic and natural ingredients for the cosmetics and personal care industry. EFfCI support the objectives of the Nagoya Protocol and the EUs compliance framework to ensure fair and equitable benefit sharing while enabling sustainable innovation.

LinkedInX
EF

EU funded project COUSIN

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

COUSIN is a Horizon Europefunded research project (www.cousinproject.eu) focusing on the conservation, characterization, and use of Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) of five flagship crops (wheat, barley, pea, lettuce, and brassicas) for breeding new varieties or organic heterogeneous materials (OHM) for sustainable agriculture.

LinkedInX
SL

Synpa-les ingrédients alimentaires de spécialité

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Synpa-les Ingredients Alimentaires de Specialité represents producers and distributors of specialty food ingredients in France. We welcome the European Commission’s initiative to consult stakeholders on the application of European Regulations (EU) No 511/2014 and No 2015/1866 in the Member States.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EF

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

EFPIA, representing the biopharmaceutical industry operating in Europe, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commission's open consultation on the EU Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) Regulation (EU No 511/2014).

LinkedInX

This submission was elaborated by the GNP-HuB project in cooperation with the SKBV of the DFG and supported by the listed signatory institutions. It is based on three sources of evidence: an online survey, the GNP-HuBs experience with ABS compliance, and information from the ABS Clearing-House. The complete submission is attached.

LinkedInX
AE

Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The European Commission has launched an evaluation of the implementation of the EU Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Regulation and opened a call for evidence to gather stakeholders views. In this context, The Spanish National Research Council (Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC) submits the attached position paper, outlining its perspectives and considerations regarding the current…

LinkedInX
BA

Bayer AG

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Bayer's corporate mission Health for all - Hunger for none underscores the essential role that access to genetic resources plays in delivering innovations for health and food security. Bayer is fully committed to compliant access to genetic resources and supports the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Nagoya Protocol, and Regulation (EU) 511/2014.

LinkedInX
SU

Stockholm University

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

Stockholm University is grateful for this chance to contribute to the evaluation of the EU regulation No 511/2014. Our input is based on accumulated experiences at the research support office which supports researchers conducting non-commercial research involving the utilization of genetic resources from other countries than Sweden.

LinkedInX
CC

Christian Council International

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Christian Council International (CCI) appreciates this opportunity to provide input to the call for evidence for the evaluation of Regulation 511/2014. In the attached document, we provide feedback on the relation between the Nagoya Protocol and Regulation 511/2014, Digital sequence information (DSI) and member state sovereignty.

LinkedInX
I

INRAE

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

INRAE is a French public research institution which carries out, for the most part, basic research activities with no commercial objective in the field of agriculture, food and the environment, using public and private funding and national and international collaborations.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EF

European Food & Fermentation Cultures Association (EFFCA)

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

The European Food and Fermentation Cultures Association (EFFCA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation of the EU ABS Regulation based on the outlined criteria of efficiency, effectiveness, coherence, relevance and EU added value. Effectiveness.

LinkedInX
KP

Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Strengthening the scientific basis of herbal medicinal products is the key objective of Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Bonn (www.koop-phyto.org). This is achieved by scientific projects that address challenges relating to herbal medicinal products.

LinkedInX

Submission on behalf of the Alliance of University and Non-University Biodiversity Research in Germany and the Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF). >>> Please find additional remarks and recommendations attached (pdf). EFFECTIVENESS Q1 The ABS Reg has supported compliance with the Nagoya Protocol (NP) and to clarify individual and institutional responsibilities.

LinkedInX
PB

PlantaRei Biotech srl

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PlantaRei Biotech is an innovative SME that addresses the growing demand for sustainable and effective ingredients, promoting a circular economy model through upcycling and the development of biosolutions. The company integrates its supply chain by recovering plant residues from carefully selected organic farms and collaborating with Italian partners to develop products with enhanced effectiveness compared to…

LinkedInX
L

Lawyer

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

I am a lawyer and independent legal consultant with over ten years experience supporting academic institutions, public research centres and SMEs in the biotechnology sector in Italy on ABS matters. In my professional practice, most challenges faced by researchers and operators - in both the public and private sectors - stem from the implementation of national ABS measures worldwide rather than from the EU Regulation…

LinkedInX
PD

Pharma Deutschland e.V.

· · filed 11 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Pharma Deutschamd generally welcomes the ABS system and is aware of the need to respect and comply with ABS requirements. Preventing future cases of biopiracy is an important goal, and this is explicitly supported by the industry. The introduction of the EU regulation aims to create uniform and harmonised processes in Europe, which we expressly welcome.

LinkedInX
E

Euroseeds

· · filed 10 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Euroseeds, representing the European seed sector, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions open consultation on the EU Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) Regulation (EU No 511/2014). The European seed and plant breeding sector accesses genetic resources as a basis for innovation, competitiveness, and the development of improved plant varieties that contribute to sustainable agriculture, food…

LinkedInX
UF

Union française des semenciers

· · filed 10 Feb 2026 · source

The Union Française des Semenciers (UFS), representing almost 100 companies active in variety breeding, seed production and marketing in France, asked the lopportunit to contribute to the European Commission’s public consultation on EU Regulation 511/2014 on access and benefit-sharing (ABS).

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 41 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.