Environmental organization · France · EU Transparency Register 629482044225-60not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 30 Aug 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track OGM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at OGM dangers? so we know who speaks for it.
OGM dangers filed 3 positions between 17 Feb 2025 and 6 Feb 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
Hello, the words are trafficked by the COM, using the word ‘biotechnology’ (‘gross value added of EUR 38.1 billion in 2022’), including any artisanal or industrial activity on food and medicine. It wants to promote biotechs (in agriculture and medicines). Normal, it is ‘progressive’, that is to say, it is _croit_ in progress. I do not believe in this, and the European citizens are less and less so.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Hello, our association defends the rights of peasants, but also of (small) seed producers. The work of the seed must be paid, but this must not be at the expense of the farmer’s remuneration. I consider that the exemption under Article 14 of Regulation 94/2100 (like Article 11 of Directive 1998/44).
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Hello, the Nagoya Protocol starts from a good principle. But it chooses modes of action that kill this principle. First of all, it accepts the principle of patents on genetic elements in living conditions. As a result, some can capture them. And those who have the most will get the most. This reinforces the exploitation of the South by the North.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 14.
Everything on this page comes from OGM dangers’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.