Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Evaluation - Groundhandling services at airports

14 submissions from 14 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 56 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 14 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

11 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 2 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 5.5 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 11Civil society 2Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 23 Apr 2020 — it ran from 30 Jan 2020.

Policy area
Transport (DG MOVE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2022

How it got here

  1. Roadmap efc12 Mar 2019
  2. Public consultation23 Apr 2020

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Swd.

Showing 14 of 14 submissions.

GA

German Airports Association ADV

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

The German Airports Association (ADV) comments on the “Evaluation Roadmap Groundhandling services at airports”:as follows: The ADV takes note that all provisions of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 are being evaluated.

LinkedInX
EB

European Business Aviation Association

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

One additional comment from one of our members: Our local FBO "FAS Frankfurt Aviation Service“ i.e. cannot provide passenger transport on the ramp because the airport operator FRAPORT insists that only two handling companies (FRAPORT Ground Services and WISAG) hold the license for this service. Therefore have to use them to transport the passengers of our business jet customers.

LinkedInX
AV

AÖV

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

The Association of Austrian Commercial Airports (AÖV) takes note of the European Commission’s evaluation of Directive 96/67/EC and adopts the roadmap. From the point of view of the AÖV, the Directive was correctly transposed in Austria by the Airport Handling Services Act (FBG), by the deadline and to the satisfaction of the Austrian aviation industry.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FM

Flughafen München GmbH

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

Directive 96/67/EC fully opened the airside handling market in 1996, with the possibility of limiting it to a maximum of two third-party handlers in certain areas. Directive 96/67/EC has been transposed in Germany under the restrictions provided for in the Directive.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AS

Airport Services Association

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

The Airport Services Association (ASA) - representing the global independent ground handling sector - welcomes the opportunity to engage with the Commission on the topic of Ground Services at EU Airports. We understand there will be opportunity for a more detailed engagement later, so for this particular feedback phase, we will limit ourselves to high level comments on the sector in Europe. 1.

LinkedInX
A

AviAlliance

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

AviAlliance welcomes the Commission’s initiative to review the implementation and functioning of the Groundhandling Directive. Safe and efficient ground handling services are essential to the day-to-day operations of both airports and airlines.

LinkedInX
BS

Bundesarbeiterkammer Österreich

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

PDF

In the opinion of the Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour, special attention must be paid in the evaluation of the stakeholders to the solutions proposed by the staff representatives (works council, trade union, etc.). This is particularly necessary as the number of stakeholders on the business side is much higher.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FO

Finnair Oyj

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

Finnair supports revision of the EU Ground Handling Directive 96/67/EC to bring real competition in Europe’s ground handling services. Further harmonisation and liberalisation of the ground handling market in the EU is needed in parallel with other parts of the value chain, and in order to deliver cost-efficient, high quality ground handling services.

LinkedInX
FH

Flughafen Hamburg GmbH

· · filed 12 Mar 2019 · source

Since all the provisions of Council Directive 96/67 of 15 October 1996 are to be reviewed, Flughafen Hamburg GmbH (FHG) has the following comments. The FHG considers it important to note that, according to EASA Basic Regulation (EU) 2018/1139, there is a parallel mandate from the Commission to EASA to develop common rules for the safe provision of groundhandling services: • It is clear that the EASA wants a…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AA

AECI-ASOCIACION ESPAÑOLA DEL EXPRESS Y DE LA CARGA AÉREA INTERNACIONAL

· · filed 11 Mar 2019 · source

Dear Sirs, The EU rules on handling currently in force are, as well known, set up by Directive 96/67/EC, which was transposed into Spanish law by Royal Decree 1161/1999 regulating the provision of airport groundhandling services.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
VD

Vereinigung der Dienstleister an Deutschen Flughäfen e.V. (VDF)

· · filed 11 Mar 2019 · source

Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports is applied in the Federal Republic of Germany and is national in the form of the groundhandling services Regulation (BADV).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FW

Flughafen Wien AG

· · filed 8 Mar 2019 · source

PDF

Flughafen Wien AG (FWAG) has, with great interest, read and adopt the roadmap entitled “Evaluation — handling services at airports”. Liberalisation and subsidiarity In the view of the FWAG, the existing Directive 96/67/EC, which was transposed in Austria by the airport groundhandling services Act, fully met its objectives.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GG

ÖGB/Gewerkschaft vida

· · filed 8 Mar 2019 · source

PDF

The Austrian Transport and Services Union (vida) (www.vida.at), which is also responsible, inter alia, for civil aviation and thus for groundhandling services, can hereby send you the following opinion on the “Roadmap: evaluation — measuring and handling services at EU airports”: From a trade union perspective, the evaluation of Directive 96/67/EC should focus in particular on education and training, social aspects…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AR

APEDV REGARDDONS

· · filed 20 Feb 2019 · source

I represent an association of parents of children with visual impairments and I am myself parents of a girl with visual impairments? I am very often travelling with my daughter at the rate of 4 flights per month on various airlines such as Air France, Hop, EasyJet, for the most part on France and from Nice. In general, I appreciate the services of accompanying staff.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 14 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.