Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2019/0017(COD) · Lapsed / Withdrawn

Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport: global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data

21 submissions from 21 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 27 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 21 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee ENVI
  1. Withdrawal by Commission · 6 Oct 2025
  2. Referred to Committee · 13 Nov 2024
  3. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 23 Sept 2020
  4. Plenary Vote · 16 Sept 2020
  5. PLENARY_REFER_COMMITTEE_INTERINSTITUTIONAL_NEGOTIATIONS · 16 Sept 2020

Who showed up

14 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 6 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.3 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 14Civil society 6Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

11 of 21
in the EU Register
48
full-time lobbying staff
€2.5M+
declared costs a year
41
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 1 Apr 2019 — it ran from 4 Feb 2019.

Policy area
Climate (DG CLIMA)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Lapsed / Withdrawn
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2019)38

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep19 Jul 2017
  2. Proposal for a regulation1 Apr 2019

Showing 21 of 21 submissions.

II

IACS - International Association of Classification Societies

· · filed 31 Mar 2019 · source

1) With regard to the data submission after verification, it is suggested to align the requirements of MRV regulations with IMO DCS, i.e. the verifier could submit the emission report to the EU through data exchange, rather than by the company itself, so as to reduce the burden on the companies.

LinkedInX
EC

European Community Shiponwers' Associations ECSA

· · filed 29 Mar 2019 · source

PDF

The European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA) and the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) welcome the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, thereafter the MRV Regulation, attempting to align the EU MRV with the global IMO Data Collection System (IMO DCS). ECSA nonetheless regrets that the European Commission did not opt for a full alignment with the IMO DCS.

LinkedInX
E

EMISA

· · filed 29 Mar 2019 · source

EMISA, as a representative of the independent manufacturers and suppliers in the marine diesel industry, welcomes the revision of the MRV Regulation with the aim of providing a more harmonised and effective global approach to the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions.

LinkedInX
AP

A.P. Moller - Maersk

· · filed 28 Mar 2019 · source

A.P. Moller – Maersk welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport. In general, A.P. Moller – Maersk welcomes the efforts from the European Commission to harmonize the MRV Regulation with some of the technical aspects of the IMO Data Collection System. However, A.P.

LinkedInX
BS

Bahamas Shipowners Association

· · filed 19 Jul 2017 · source

PDF

Comments from the Bahamas Shipowners Association on the Revision of Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/757 on monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, in view of an alignment with the IMO data collection system The Bahamas Shipowners Association (BSA) welcomes initiatives on the reduction of GHG emissions from…

LinkedInX
TJ

The Japanese Shipowners' Association

· · filed 19 Jul 2017 · source

The Japanese Shipowners’ Association would welcome the European Commission to revise EU MRV regulation. Recital 34 of the EU MRV Regulation states that a global MRV system is preferable as it could be regarded as more effective due to its broader scope and that where an agreement on a global MRV system is reached the Commission should review the regulation with a view to aligning it to the global MRV system.

LinkedInX
IN

Indian National Shipowners' Association

· · filed 19 Jul 2017 · source

We are happy to see the process initiated for alignment of EU MRV Regulations with IMO CO2 Data Collection System. A global system will be able to deliver far greater reduction in GHG emission than a regional one. It will also greatly reduce the administrative burden, time and cost on shipowners / operators and their seafarers of reporting different sets of data under two different regimes.

LinkedInX
OC

Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF)

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

PDF

Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) would like to thank the Commission for the opportunity to comment on the ‘Revision of the Shipping MRV Regulation’. OCIMF supports and welcomes this step to fully align the EU scheme with the IMO. OCIMF was a member of the ESSF MRV working group and in this forum highlighted key concerns regarding the lack of alignment between the EU and IMO system.

LinkedInX
IC

International Chamber of Shipping

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

ICS welcomes revising the EU Shipping MRV Regulation in order align the EU MRV with the global IMO Data Collection System (DCS). The shipping industry is encouraged by the positive statements from the European Commission acknowledging the significant progress made by IMO Member States towards addressing GHG emissions from international shipping.

LinkedInX
PT

Prime Tanker Management Inc.

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

Prime Tanker Management Inc. considers that as the EU MRV of shipping emissions and the Data Collection System of International Maritime Organization are developed based on the same principles of the shipping sector and their technical scope is common in monitoring, reporting, verifying and finally reducing the emissions of CO2, the Full alignment between them is the only way that can assure feasibility, cost…

LinkedInX
ES

European Shippers' Association (ESC)

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

Maritime transport, which is the major transport mode in terms of volume transported, emits around 1000 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Shipping emissions are predicted to increase between 50% and 250% by 2050 – depending on future economic and energy developments.

LinkedInX
EC

European co-operation for Accreditation

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

On behalf of the Certification Committee of the European co-operation for Accreditation: Alignment of the EU MRV with a global system, IMO system, should focus on ensuring a harmonized and robust approach for verification of the requested data as well as to ensure the validity of the data. In that respect third party verification of the data is considered a must.

LinkedInX
TD

T&D Europe

· · filed 18 Jul 2017 · source

PDF

T&D Europe, the European Association of the Electricity Transmission and Distribution Equipment and Services Industry, welcomes the opportunity to respond to the inception impact assessment initiative in the context of the forthcoming revision of the Shipping MRV Regulation.

LinkedInX
IP

International Parcel Tankers Association

· · filed 14 Jul 2017 · source

The International Parcel Tankers Association welcomes progress made at the International Maritime Organization in developing a strategy for addressing Greenhouse Gas emissions from shipping, and in particular the adoption in 2016 of the MARPOL amendments to introduce the Data Collection System. IPTA further welcomes the initiative to review the EU MRV regulation in accordance with Article 22 of the regulation.

LinkedInX
TE

Transport & Environment

· · filed 13 Jul 2017 · source

EU shipping MRV has 3 main objectives: 1. Provide accurate and transparent bottom-up ship emissions data 2. Address market barriers for uptake of efficient ships 3. Incentivise operational efficiency ships by providing clear metrics for real transport work By moving first, the adoption of the EU MRV incentivised the IMO to start work on a global Data Collection System (DCS) and as such, this clear leadership by the…

LinkedInX
LS

Lloyd's Register

· · filed 13 Jul 2017 · source

Comments structured around the inception impact assessment document: A. Context, problem definition and subsidiarity check We agree that the administrative burden of possible double reporting requirements for the EU and IMO schemes is a concern if it does not bring any notable benefit in understanding and control of CO2 emissions.

LinkedInX
SS

Swedish Shipowners Association

· · filed 13 Jul 2017 · source

The Swedish Shipowners Association is positive to the intent ofEU MRV, i.e. to determine the amount of CO₂ stemming from ships. We believe a data system is an important step to provide the necessary data as a basis for further actions to reduce absolute CO₂emissions.

LinkedInX
VD

Verband Deutscher Reeder (VDR)

· · filed 12 Jul 2017 · source

The shipping industry is encouraged by the positive statements from the European Commission which acknowledge the significant progress made by IMO Member States towards addressing GHG emissions from international shipping. With the full support of the industry, IMO Member States have agreed inter alia to develop a comprehensive strategy for the further reduction of GHG emissions from shipping.

LinkedInX
WS

World Shipping Council

· · filed 7 Jul 2017 · source

PDF

Extract from the attached joint position paper: The European Community Shipowners’ Associations and the International Chamber of Shipping - in conjunction with the Asian Shipowners’ Association, BIMCO, INTERCARGO INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO and the World Shipping Council welcome the revision of the EU Shipping MRV Regulation undertaken for the purpose to align the EU MRV with the global IMO Data Collection System (IMO…

LinkedInX

Dear European Commission, Dear Lady/Sir, Thank you very much for sending me the roadmap. I have read the roadmap and propose the following proposals for further development of the living and living environment protection of the marine environment. Protection of the marine environment naturally affects the social and economic environment as well.

LinkedInX
UN

United Nations - NGO CEREPPOL

· · filed 21 Jun 2017 · source

Mandatory fuel consumption data collection is scheduled for 2019 under Regulation 22A. In this regard, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has adopted a mandatory fuel consumption data collection system for international shipping, requiring ships above 5,000 gross tonnage to start collecting and reporting data to an IMO database from the start of 2019.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 21 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.