Other · France · EU Transparency Register 369088318746-31
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 71 associations and networks of public authorities on this site, they rank #28 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Accreditation? so we know who speaks for it.
European Accreditation filed 3 positions between 18 Jul 2017 and 4 Jun 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Comments on Document „Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized conditions for the marketing of construction products, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Regulation (EU) 305/2011” 2022/0094 (COD) 1.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
European Accreditation (EA) appreciates the constructive, fruitful and trustful cooperation with the European Commission on the accreditation of verifiers under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), especially regarding embedded emissions. This cooperation demonstrates the value of a well-defined accreditation framework for activities that fall within the scope of conformity assessment.
On behalf of the Certification Committee of the European co-operation for Accreditation: Alignment of the EU MRV with a global system, IMO system, should focus on ensuring a harmonized and robust approach for verification of the requested data as well as to ensure the validity of the data. In that respect third party verification of the data is considered a must.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put European Accreditation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 6.
Everything on this page comes from European Accreditation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.