Snap welcomes the European Commissions (EC) initiative to simplify the EU's digital rulebook. To enhance the overall effectiveness and applicability, particularly for challenger platforms, and in line with the EUs broader simplification and competitiveness agenda, we also recommend the following: - Expand impact assessments to explicitly examine the effects of new legislation on challenger companies in digital…
Snap Inc.
Company · United States · EU Transparency Register 976985829492-08
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1212 companies & groups on this site, they rank #371 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Member of DOT Europe
- the voice of leading digital
- online and tech companies in Europe
- www.doteurope.eu
- Member of the think-tank Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), www.cerre.eu
- Member of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), www.itic.org
- Member of the Center for Information Policy Leadership
- (CIPL)
- https://www.informationpolicycentre.com/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Snap, Inc.
- Head office
- Santa Monica, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Snap in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Snap Inc.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Snap Inc. filed 5 positions between 22 Dec 2020 and 24 Oct 2025, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Snap Inc. – Response to the European Commission’s Public Consultation on the Digital Fairness Act (DFA) I. Introduction Snap welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the European Commission’s (EC) public consultation on the proposed Digital Fairness Act (DFA).
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Snap is overall supportive of the DSA proposal. We are however concerned that it may not, in its current state, fully achieve the objectives envisaged by the Commission of clarifying liability for digital intermediaries for the benefit of consumers and innovation. Snap would therefore like to present its main concerns.
As a company with privacy and safety at its core, Snap Inc. welcomes the Commission’s initiative to establish a clear and harmonised EU legal framework to prevent and combat online child sexual abuse (CSA). - Snap endorses the introduction of targeted and uniform obligations of CSA risk assessment and mitigation for providers.
In general, Snap Inc. welcomes the initiative of the European Commission to propose a legislative proposal on the detection, removal and reporting of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) online. Such an initiative is of the utmost importance for obvious policy and safety imperatives which Snap strongly supports.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Snap Inc. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 154.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Snap Inc.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.