In response to the call for feedback, PLK welcomes the opportunity to present its comments on the revision of the DA for the EU taxonomy. In our view, the current wording of the legal acts requires updating and simplification in several aspects, in order to ease the burden and adapt the regulations to the actual realities of businesses.
PLK
PLK
Industry association · Poland · EU Transparency Register 237300824908-30
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #214 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Zarządca uczestniczy m.in. w organizacjach CER
- EIM
- RNE
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. (PLK SA)
- Head office
- Warszawa, Poland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track PLK in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at PLK? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
PLK filed 4 positions between 24 Sept 2024 and 7 May 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
We welcome the European Commissions initiative to simplify administrative burdens in environmental legislation. As part of this call for feedback, we submit our comments on COM(2025) 984 - the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on accelerating environmental impact assessments.
We welcome the European Commission's initiative to harmonize and improve the application of the "do no serious harm" (DNSH) principle within the next Multiannual Financial Framework. This direction is particularly important from the perspective of reducing excessive administrative burdens and increasing regulatory coherence throughout the Union.
We, as PLK (Polish railway infrastrtucture manager), accept with satisfaction the aforementioned initiative and submit our position to the Commission in order to include the below mentioned requests, which present the interests of our Company and the sector during the work on the draft of the new financial instrument (CEF3). 1.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- A2A · 3 files in common
- Repsol · 3 files in common
- CER aisbl - Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies · 3 files in common
- Snam S.p.A. · 3 files in common
- FEDENE · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 80.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from PLK’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.