Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
INT

Interferry

Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 943498910207-51

5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #367 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • INTERFERRY is an associate member of the International Chamber of Shipping (London, UK).
  • INTERFERRY is an observer to the European Community Shipowners Association (ECSA
  • Brussels
  • BE).
  • INTERFERRY is an observer to the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Interferry Inc. (Interferry)
Head office
Victoria, Canada
EU office
Helsingborg

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Interferry in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Interferry? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Interferry engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 4 files, from Interferry or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Interferry filed 5 positions between 17 Jan 2022 and 14 Apr 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.

2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated actfiled 5 Dec 2025PDFsource

Interferry welcomes this opportunity to provide evidence in relation to the review of the EU taxonomy climate delegated act. In summary we find that the TSC within the Taxonomy are in part not realistic and in part not fit for purpose. We have outlined our detailed comments in the attached document.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026PDFsource

INTERFERRY welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the consultation on the draft EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act and on the European Commissions efforts to improve the usability of the Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) under the EU Taxonomy. In summary, our salient points are: 1) The use of EEDI/EEXI as a measure for energy efficiency for ro-ro cargo and ro-ro passenger ships is misguided.

Trans-European energy infrastructure: guidelinesfiled 5 Aug 2025PDFsource

Interferry is a shipping association representing the ferry industry world-wide. Our key message in relation to the European grid package is the importance to factor in the total electricity demand that ships will need in European ports due to FuelEU Maritime requirements to use Onshore Power Supply, both for hotel load and to charge onboard batteries. Our comments are provided in the attached file.

Passenger rights in the context of multimodal journeysfiled 5 Mar 2024PDFsource

Interferry is a shipping association representing the ferry industry world-wide. ECSA represents 21 national shipowners associations based in the EU and Norway. In November 2023, the European Commission presented a series of proposals designed to improve the experience of passengers and travellers by strengthening their rights.

Passenger rights in the context of multimodal journeysfiled 17 Jan 2022source

Interferry would like to share the following views: Aim 1) We support efforts to improve clarity of the Maritime Regulation (the MarReg). The MarReg has not been tested in the CJEU to the same extent as the Aviation Regulation and principles remain unclear. Aim 2) Improved awareness and clarity will assist passengers to claim and understand what they are entitled to and not entitled to.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 173.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Interferry’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.