ESRS 2 SBM-3 Paragraph 29 should be incorporated with 28. It has to be clear that in what circumstances that quantitative information are not required to be reported. Now it is very confusing. Add as paragraph 28 (C) if it does not have the skills, capabilities or resources to provide that quantitative information, and delete paragraph 29.
IND
Independent
Other · Belgium
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 657 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 657 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 657 consultation files tracked so far (57,479 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Independent in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Independent? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Independent filed 3 positions between 30 Apr 2026 and 8 May 2026, across 2 of the 657 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Anticipated financial effect related questions ESRS 1, 10.3, 125 (b) all information about anticipated financial effects, . required in paragraph 27 of ESRS 2 General Disclosures and in ESRS E1-11 for their financial years prior to financial year 2027, with the exception of ESRS E1-11 paragraph 38(a)(b) and 39 (a)(b) There is no paragraph 38 (a)(b).
Advancing Gender Equality in STEM and Digital Inclusion for Girls in Underserved Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa Submitted by: Blessing Oluebebe Simon | Capacity: Independent Volunteer & Field Advocate | Country: Nigeria | Date: April 2026 1. Introduction Submitted by Blessing Oluebebe Simon, an independent volunteer who delivered STEM and AI awareness programmes to girls in underserved Nigerian communities.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Independent next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Independent’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.