FederUnacoma welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop unified and simplified guidelines for the application of the do no significant harm principle within the 20282034 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). However, it should be noted that in the recent past, the application of the DNSH principle has generated significant challenges.
FederUnacoma
Industry association · Italy · EU Transparency Register 001339619562-21
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #730 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- FederUnacoma aderisce in Italia a:
- Confindustria (associazione italiana imprese manifatturiere)
- FederUnacoma aderisce in Europa a:
- CEMA - associazione europea costruttori macchine per agricoltura
- EGMF - associazione europea costruttori macchine per giardinaggio
- EUROMOT - associazione europea dei costruttori di motori a combustione interna
- ORGALIM- associazione europea industrie ingegneristiche e tecnologiche (tramite CEMA)
- A livello mondiale, FederUnacoma è membra di Agrievolution (www.agrievolution.com)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Federazione Nazionale Costruttori Macchine per l'Agricoltura (FederUnacoma)
- Head office
- Roma, Italy
- EU office
- Bologna
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track FederUnacoma in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FederUnacoma? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
FederUnacoma filed 2 positions between 19 Nov 2025 and 31 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
To our experience, the main issues with market surveillance are: . lack of uniformity at EU level. We know that market surveillance is up to the Member States. Unfortunately, as a matter of fact each State has its own priorities which are not shared by the others. This results in lack of uniformity in the EU. A certain product may need to be modified only for a specific national market; .
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FederUnacoma’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.