Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CI

CONNECT International

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 184027545471-80

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #319 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
3
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Advisory Council on Youth of Council of Europe - https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/advisory-council-on-youth

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track CONNECT in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at CONNECT International? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files CONNECT International engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from CONNECT International or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

CONNECT International filed 2 positions between 27 Mar 2026 and 31 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Draft Commission guidance on the Cyber Resilience Actfiled 27 Mar 2026source

Connect International welcomes the European Commission's draft and the efforts to strengthen cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements. From the perspective of our work on youth rights, digital wellbeing, and media literacy, we would like to highlight a complementary dimension that could be more explicitly reflected in the Commissions guidance.

Implementing regulation Art 92 and 101 AI Actfiled 31 Mar 2026source

Connect International welcomes the draft Implementing Regulation and the European Commissions efforts to establish clear and enforceable procedural arrangements for the evaluation of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models. However, Article 3 creates a striking imbalance: it is highly specific in defining what an expert must not be, while remaining largely silent on what an expert must know.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from CONNECT International’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.