Connect International welcomes the European Commission's draft and the efforts to strengthen cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements. From the perspective of our work on youth rights, digital wellbeing, and media literacy, we would like to highlight a complementary dimension that could be more explicitly reflected in the Commissions guidance.
CI
CONNECT International
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 184027545471-80
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #576 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
4
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Advisory Council on Youth of Council of Europe - https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/advisory-council-on-youth
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track CONNECT in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CONNECT International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CONNECT International filed 2 positions between 27 Mar 2026 and 31 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Connect International welcomes the draft Implementing Regulation and the European Commissions efforts to establish clear and enforceable procedural arrangements for the evaluation of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models. However, Article 3 creates a striking imbalance: it is highly specific in defining what an expert must not be, while remaining largely silent on what an expert must know.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put CONNECT International next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CONNECT International’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.