Article 93 is the DNAs core open-internet provision. Article 93(6) empowers the Commission to define, through implementing acts, the conditions for offering specialised or optimised services. OpenMineds proposal is to ensure that those future rules remain technology-neutral and do not unnecessarily exclude or place at a disadvantage privacy-preserving distributed approaches, including compute-to-data, federated…
OF
OpenMined Foundation
NGO · United States · EU Transparency Register 6393276102965-57
6
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 326 tracked
6
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #98 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2026
in the register since
Declares membership of
- The OpenMined Foundation participates in or collaborates with the following initiatives/organisations (participation…
- The AI Aliance: https://thealliance.ai/
- Accelerate Science Now (ASN): https://acceleratesciencenow.com/
- Open Forum for AI at the Carnegie Mellon University (OFAI): https://www.cmu.edu/engin/programs/ofai.html
- Project Liberty Alliance: https://www.projectliberty.io/alliance/
- OpenMined also undertakes project-based collaborations with academic, civil-society and industry partners. These coll…
- https://openmined.org/foundation/
- https://openmined.org/blog/tag/partnerships/
- https://github.com/openmined
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- New York, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track OpenMined in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at OpenMined Foundation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
OpenMined Foundation filed 6 positions between 3 Apr 2026 and 15 Aug 2026, across 6 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
What they argued
The OpenMined foundation supports a balanced European approach to copyright, creativity, and artificial intelligence. The EU should avoid two extremes: allowing unrestricted extraction of creative and informational content by AI providers, or creating an overly restrictive copyright framework that would make the open web dependent on individual licensing for almost every form of machine access.
The OpenMined Foundation welcomes the draft guidance as a useful and proportionate starting point. We particularly welcome the recognition that obligations for open-source software stewards should depend on the concrete type of support they provide. The examples already included are helpful.
OpenMined welcomes the draft implementing regulation as a useful step in clarifying how the Commission will conduct evaluations of general-purpose AI models under Article 92 of the AI Act. The draft would, however, benefit from stating more explicitly that, where appropriate, evaluation access should follow a proportionate and least-intrusive approach before resorting to direct access to source code, model weights…
OpenMined is a non-profit building open-source infrastructure that lets organisations make sensitive data available for AI development and evaluation without transferring it. We welcome the proposed Act, but its sovereignty framework measures everything except control: the Annex II assurance criteria rest on establishment, location, and ownership tests, with no route for verifiable technical controlconfidential…
OpenMined is a non-profit building open-source, privacy-preserving AI infrastructure used by data holders, researchers and public bodies in the EU and internationally. We welcome the proposed Chips Act 2.0, but it is silent on confidential computing: the terms "trusted execution environment", "secure enclave" and "remote attestation" do not appear in the proposal, even though the EU's wider sovereignty agenda the…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ITI - Information Technology Industry Council · 4 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 3 files in common
- Confederation of Swedish Enterprise · 3 files in common
- Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) · 3 files in common
- Adigital (Asociación Española de la Economía Digital) · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 64.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from OpenMined Foundation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.