Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Memo Maija Rantamäki 1 (2) 5 May 2022 Answer by the Finnish Forest Industries Federation to the call for evidence on New EU Framework for Forest Monitoring and Strategic Plans The Finnish Forest Industries Federation (FFIF) welcomes the EU Commission's efforts to improve the quality and comparability of EU-level forest data.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Trustworthy information about the status and utilisation of forests, such as the recent MAES report by JRC , are key for responsible decision making. Without the existence of good quality, consistent and available data, policy and financial decision makers cannot make informed decisions. However, the current datasets are far from being consistent.
The EUTR was a good step into the right direction, but there are at least three elements, which require further improvement (a) the annex of the legislation must be all inclusive to cover all forest related products. This is going to be even more relevant if the EU pushes the implementation of the BioEconomy strategy further.
The Finnish Forest Industries Federation welcomes the upcoming fitness check to evaluate the key legal instruments of the FLEGT Action Plan, namely the FLEGT Regulation and EU TR. The Finnish forest industry actively promotes procurement of legal timber and subsequently usage of legal timber in the whole value chain.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.