Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

WE
Wild Europe

NGO · Netherlands

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Files both filed on (2)

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests · Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests

Wild Europe · filed 6 May 2022 · source

Trustworthy information about the status and utilisation of forests, such as the recent MAES report by JRC , are key for responsible decision making. Without the existence of good quality, consistent and available data, policy and financial decision makers cannot make informed decisions. However, the current datasets are far from being consistent.

ClientEarth · filed 6 May 2022 · source

Public debate focuses mainly on deforestation and illegal logging in the countries of the Global South, however, forestry crime is a common problem across the world – including the EU. Cyprus, Greece and Latvia are mentioned in this context, as well as Bulgaria and Slovakia.

Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Wild Europe · filed 19 Feb 2020 · source

The EUTR was a good step into the right direction, but there are at least three elements, which require further improvement (a) the annex of the legislation must be all inclusive to cover all forest related products. This is going to be even more relevant if the EU pushes the implementation of the BioEconomy strategy further.

ClientEarth · filed 28 Feb 2020 · source

ClientEarth considers that both the EUTR & FLEGT Regulation have contributed to more legality and transparency in the global timber supply chain and have made progress towards achieving the objectives of the FLEGT Action Plan.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.