Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

TL
Transport for London

Public authority · United Kingdom

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
0.2
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €50K+ a year · in the register since 2012

Files both filed on (2)

Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) · Evaluation of the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)

Transport for London · filed 14 May 2020 · source

The Mayor of London, through the Greater London Authority, is responsible for transport and environment in Greater London. The GLA welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Development of new European Emissions Standards for cars, vans, lorries and buses. We feel it is valuable to respond given that poor performance of previous Euro standards delayed improvements to London’s air quality.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 9 Feb 2023 · source

BEUC regrets that the level of ambition aimed at in the preparatory studies and the Commission impact assessment has not materialised in the legislative proposal. This is particularly damagin in terms of good governance.

Evaluation of the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive

Transport for London · filed 20 Mar 2019 · source

Our high level comments are as follows: Data availability Data, both public and private, on charging point location and utilisation is crucial for planning a network of alternative fuel infrastructure. Member states should maintain accurate and up to date national charging point registries of public and private alternative fuel infrastructure and make this data freely available in accessible formats.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 20 Mar 2019 · source

BEUC welcomes the initiative of the EC to evaluate the 2014 directive on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, as the well-functioning of this directive is essential to make e-mobility convenient for consumers. BEUC therefore intends to actively contribute to the discussions regarding the upcoming revision of this text.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.