Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

TOM
TomTom

Company · Netherlands

7
files engaged
of 583 tracked
7
positions filed
in those 583 files
1.8
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €300K+ a year · in the register since 2016

Files both filed on (5)

Cyber Resilience Act · General Product Safety Regulation · Liability for defective products · Type approval of motor vehicles regarding access to in-vehicle generated data · Intelligent Road Transport Systems

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Cyber Resilience Act

TomTom · filed 23 Jan 2023 · source

TomTom wishes to provide feedback regarding the public consultation for the proposal for a regulation on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements (amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020) published on the 15th of September 2022, the Cyber Resilience Act.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 23 Jan 2023 · source

BEUC welcomes the European Commission proposal on the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). This proposal answers a longstanding need that BEUC and its members have identified and warned about repeatedly. Over the past years, BEUC members have demonstrated that too many connected products sold on the European market lack even the most basic security features. Too many products are putting consumers at risk on a daily basis.

General Product Safety Regulation

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 26 Aug 2020 · source

BEUC strongly welcomes the announcement of the European Commission to review the General Product Safety Directive. We agree to the problem definition as outlined in the roadmap which emphasises the challenges posed by new technologies, e-commerce and a fragmented legislative framework for market surveillance.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 29 Sept 2021 · source

BEUC strongly supports the draft for a General Product Safety Regulation. We agree on the objectives and welcome: • The underlined value of the safety net function and precautionary principle • Coherent market surveillance rules between harmonised and non-harmonised products as well as the new tools given to Member States • Stronger traceability in the supply chain and a greater responsibility for safety of online…

TomTom · filed 4 Oct 2021 · source

TomTom welcomes the fact that Type-approval for motor vehicles and the General Safety Regulation (GSR) are both listed as “Union harmonization legislation” covering the automotive sector. Obligations on economic operators and their placing on the market of products defined in the GPSD proposal only apply when obligations are not yet covered by Union harmonisation legislation.

Liability for defective products

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 22 Jul 2021 · source

BEUC welcomes the possibility to give feedback on the European Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on “Civil liability – adapting liability rules to the digital age and artificial intelligence”. BEUC recommends a comprehensive upgrade of the EU Product Liability Directive, which was adopted 36 years ago and is therefore no longer adapted to cope with the challenges brought by new technologies.

TomTom · filed 9 Dec 2022 · source

TomTom wishes to submit feedback on the Product Liability Directive together with fellow location technology provider HERE Technologies. Our position paper gives feedback on both the Product Liability Directive and the AI Liability Directive. Please refer to our position paper for full details.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 10 Dec 2022 · source

BEUCs preliminary feedback on the PLD proposal: BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, welcomes the initiative of the European Commission to revise the Product Liability Directive (PLD). However, the European Commission proposal (the proposal) does not sufficiently address fundamental issues like the subsidiary liability of online marketplaces, the burden of proof, the liability exemptions as well as the…

Type approval of motor vehicles regarding access to in-vehicle generated data

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 14 Jul 2022 · source

BEUC reaffirms the urgent need for a strong regulatory framework on access to vehicle data, functions and resources. The problems are well identified and have been presented to the Commission on several occasions, notably during a wokrshop on 17 September 2021. We provide a detailed feedback in the document attached.

TomTom · filed 1 Aug 2022 · source

As Europe’s leading independent location technology specialist, TomTom appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to this call for evidence for an impact assessment on access to in-vehicle data. TomTom welcomes additional sector-specific legislation regulating access to in-vehicle data, as the Data Act is too general to sufficiently cover the complexity of a product such as a connected car.

Intelligent Road Transport Systems

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

BEUC welcomes the foreseen revision of the ITS Directive and joins the Commission in its assessment of the three key problem drivers for the swift deployment of ITS infrastructure. We also fully support the Commission in its intention to make use of a stronger ITS Directive to achieve the European Green Deal objectives.

TomTom · filed 20 Mar 2022 · source

HERE and TomTom wish to provide feedback to the proposal of the European Commission to amend Directive 2010/40/EU on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport. We acknowledge the Commission’s endeavor to increase the deployment and operational use of ITS services across the EU.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.