Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
5.7
declared FTE
self-declared
4
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2M+ a year · in the register since 2009

SCA
Scania CV AB

Company · Sweden

8
files engaged
of 583 tracked
8
positions filed
in those 583 files
3.5
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €600K+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Industrial property: legal protection of designs. Recast · Industrial property: protection of Community design

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Industrial property: legal protection of designs. Recast

LVMH - Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

Dear Madam, We would like to thank the European Commission and DG GROW for this call for input and this opportunity to give our opinion on the proposals for a Regulation and a Directive on designs. Designs are a fundamental intellectual property right for the LVMH Group Houses and the relevant legal framework is a major topic for the Group.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Scania CV AB · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

We at Scania CV AB oppose to the EU Commission's proposed revision of the Directive on the legal protection of designs and the Regulation on the Community design. Design protection should give the automotive industry the same opportunity to prevent the sale of competing spare parts of lower quality and with lower product safety, just like other companies.

Industrial property: protection of Community design

LVMH - Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

Dear Madam, We would like to thank the European Commission and DG GROW for this call for input and this opportunity to give our opinion on the proposals for a Regulation and a Directive on designs. Designs are a fundamental intellectual property right for the LVMH Group Houses and the applicable legal framework is a major topic for the Group.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Scania CV AB · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

We at Scania CV AB oppose to the EU Commission's proposed revision of the Directive on the legal protection of designs and the Regulation on the Community design. Design protection should give the automotive industry the same opportunity to prevent the sale of competing spare parts of lower quality and with lower product safety, just like other companies.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.