Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Company · Germany
Industry association · Finland
Declared costs: €600K+ a year · in the register since 2010
Commission Regulation amending the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and correcting Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/669 · Digital Product Passport (DPP) service providers
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Technology Industries of Finland · filed 6 Feb 2019 · source
A vote on the classification of cobalt will be held at the February meeting of the REACH committee. According to the current information, the vote at the meeting will be held on the Commission’s proposal for a new hazard classification, with the main topic being that cobalt is carcinogenic 1B on all exposure routes, with a GCL (General concentration limit) of 0.1, and a new working group should be established to…
GSB-Wahl GMBH · filed 7 Feb 2019 · source
GSB Wahl GmbH is a small enterprise producing printing inks for various applications. Many of our products contain titanium dioxide. The proposed amendment to the CLP Regulation would have far-reaching consequences for us as TiO2 is not to be replaced by other substances. The opacity is unique and it is therefore absolutely essential.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
GSB-Wahl GMBH · filed 15 Nov 2024 · source
Ladies and Gentlemen, the company for which I am working, is a small company in the printing ink industry. I work as a freelance worker and focus on regulatory matters. Any additional burden on the company should be kept to a minimum, otherwise it jeopardises competitiveness. If necessary and possible, we will try to meet the requirements with the least effort and create DPP somehow ourselves.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Technology Industries of Finland · filed 10 Dec 2024 · source
Technology Industries of Finland appreciates the opportunity to provide early feedback on the upcoming delegated regulation that defines the requirements for digital product passport (DPP) service providers. Recommendations for the upcoming delegated regulation defining requirements for Digital Product Passport service providers: 1.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.