Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Academic / research · Finland
Other · Austria
Declared costs: €2.8M+ a year · in the register since 2010
Evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation · Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates · Protection of workers from asbestos
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · filed 7 Mar 2025 · source
The EU cosmetic legislation has failed to increase consumer safety regarding acrylate-based artificial nail products the use of which carries a risk of acrylate contact allergy. Contact allergy is permanent and may have adverse health effects on the consumer beyond the inability to use acrylic nails anymore.
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 21 Mar 2025 · source
The Austrian Chamber of Commerce welcomes the European Commission’s efforts to evaluate the cosmetics regulatory framework in order to allow for further development. The current legal framework provides the basis for a high quality of cosmetic products and thus also for the protection of consumers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 16 Mar 2022 · source
WKÖ Draft Input on Roadmaps for revised OELs for lead and diisocyanates We welcome the opportunity to voice our opinion and concerns on the occasion of the call for evidence for an impact assessment on a proposal for a Directive on protecting workers from exposure to chemicals (lead and di-isocyanates).
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source
HBM4EU is a joint effort of 28 countries, the European Environment Agency and the European Commission, co-funded under Horizon 2020. The initiative is coordinating and advancing human biomonitoring (HBM) in Europe. HBM4EU is generating evidence of the actual exposure of citizens to chemicals and the possible health effects in order to support policy making.
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 16 Mar 2022 · source
WKÖ Draft Input on Roadmap for revised OEL for asbestos We welcome the opportunity to voice our opinion and concerns on the occasion of the call for evidence for an impact assessment on a proposal for a Directive on protecting workers from asbestos exposure.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source
When revising the asbestos OEL it is of outmost importance to specify the width of fibres the OEL relates to. The RAC opinion clearly states that also thinner (<0.2 µm) fibres are carcinogenic and should be considered when measuring asbestos exposure.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.