Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

FAC
FACE

NGO · Belgium

4
files engaged
of 583 tracked
4
positions filed
in those 583 files
12
declared FTE
self-declared
10
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2009

EPO
European Pet Organization (EPO)

Industry association · Netherlands

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
1.6
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €50K+ a year · in the register since 2016

Files both filed on (2)

Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability · Preventing illegal trade in wildlife

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability

European Pet Organization (EPO) · filed 27 Feb 2024 · source

The European Pet Organization (EPO) would like to thank the European Commission for affording stakeholders the opportunity to provide feedback on the new rules covering the welfare and traceability of dogs and cats as presented this past December.

FACE · filed 11 Mar 2024 · source

The European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE), representing 7 million hunters in Europe, wishes to make the following observations with regard to the EC proposal for the welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability. Animal welfare is an important topic for Europes hunters.

Preventing illegal trade in wildlife

European Pet Organization (EPO) · filed 28 Oct 2021 · source

The European Pet Organization (EPO) – representing the voice of the pet sector in Europe- and Ornamental Fish International (OFI) – representing the global aquatic ornamental sector- would like first to thank the European Commission for providing the opportunity to share their respective feedback on the published roadmap for the revision of the EU Action Plan Against Wildlife Trafficking.

FACE · filed 29 Oct 2021 · source

FACE’s comments We acknowledge that good progress has been made on most of the actions set in the Action Plan as EC’s mid-term progress report has concluded. The EU already has a strong policy and legal framework for preventing and raising awareness for wildlife trafficking. Increasing enforcement and effectiveness of existing policies against wildlife trafficking should be a primary goal of the new Action Plan.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.