Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

EFE
3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Files both filed on (2)

Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals · EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals

EDC-Free Europe coalition · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

EDC-Free Europe coalition welcomes the EC plans for the revision of REACH so that the Regulation fully delivers on its objectives to ensure a high level of protection for human health & the environment, and on the commitments of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). Inadequate control of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) under REACH is one of the crucial areas of concerns.

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

REACH plays a vital role in reducing chemical risks in Europe and globally; still, REACH suffers from major shortcomings, as correctly outlined in the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA). Thus, BEUC welcomes the Commission’s intention to revise REACH to achieve the goals of the Chemicals Strategy (CS). The IIA is however ambiguous and presents several CS actions as optional or omits them entirely, e.g.

EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · filed 29 Oct 2021 · source

The Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) plays a vital role in protecting consumers against chemical risks; still, the CPR suffers from major shortcomings, as correctly outlined in the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA). Thus, BEUC welcomes the Commission’s intention to revise the CPR to achieve the goals of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS).

EDC-Free Europe coalition · filed 1 Nov 2021 · source

EDC-Free Europe is a coalition of public interest groups representing more than 70 environmental, health, women's and consumer groups across Europe who share a concern about hormone disrupting chemicals and their impact on our health and wildlife.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.