Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Schiphol has a major impact on Amsterdam and the region. The airport creates international connectivity, creating prosperity for its users and employment for the city and the region. However, the airport’s operations are also detrimental to prosperity: through direct and indirect land take, noise pollution, nuisance, nuisance, adverse effects on the health of local residents and on the environment.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
Europeans For Fair Competition (E4FC) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to assess the current EU airport legislation through a fitness check. E4FC, a unique coalition of European airlines and unions representing airline employees, believes this review is needed to ensure comprehensive and consistent regulatory frameworks that remains effective in the rapidly evolving aviation landscape.
As far as the city of Amsterdam is concerned, further growth of air traffic in our region is not a given due to reasons of climate, safety, nuisance and public health. Aviation too often limits the building ambitions of Amsterdam and the region. For us, quality of life, climate and housing always take precedence over air travel.
Europeans for Fair Competition (E4FC), the association of European airlines and unions representing airline employees, is of the view that the current Slot Regulation has served well and continues to be fit-for-purpose. Therefore, the current rules do not require substantial modifications.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.
