Amsterdam welcomes the Post euro 6/VI initiative from The European Commission to ensure a high level of health protection and improve air quality of mainly the urban areas by reducing air pollutant emissions from road transport and setting harmonised rules for vehicles. Current EU legislation has failed to ensure real world vehicle emissions comply with the emission limits during the entire lifespan of vehicles.
CA
City of Amsterdam
Public authority · Netherlands
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 583 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track City in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at City of Amsterdam? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
City of Amsterdam filed 4 positions between 3 Jun 2020 and 6 Jun 2024, across 4 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 2 filed2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
Dear sir/madam, We like to thank the European Commission for this opportunity to provide input. From our reaction you will learn that we are enthusiastic about a more ambitious agenda for the eIDAS framework. As one of Europe’s cultural and market pillars, the City of Amsterdam is actively engaging in projects to enhance full participation of its citizens and visitors in our modern digital city.
Schiphol has a major impact on Amsterdam and the region. The airport creates international connectivity, creating prosperity for its users and employment for the city and the region. However, the airport’s operations are also detrimental to prosperity: through direct and indirect land take, noise pollution, nuisance, nuisance, adverse effects on the health of local residents and on the environment.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
As far as the city of Amsterdam is concerned, further growth of air traffic in our region is not a given due to reasons of climate, safety, nuisance and public health. Aviation too often limits the building ambitions of Amsterdam and the region. For us, quality of life, climate and housing always take precedence over air travel.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put City of Amsterdam next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from City of Amsterdam’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.