Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The full BSAC response is attached to this extract. Procedural aspects The BSAC underlines that the BSAC was not formally consulted on this proposal before the opening of the feedback mechanism and no formal discussions within the BSAC had previously taken place, despite the inference of such discussions under the heading stakeholder consultations in the proposal.
The Stockholm University Baltic Sea Centres comments below refer primarily to the proposal to amend the Baltic MAP. They are to a large extent also relevant for the other MAPs. Summary - The Commission proposal should be withdrawn. It is faulty in content and the process leading up to the proposal was deficient. - The Commission proposal would increase the level of risk permitted by the MAP.
INTRODUCTION The BSAC takes note of the Commissions Communication and accompanying Staff Working Document. The BSAC provides feedback and comments following the Commissions request. On 7th July 2023, the BSAC has already sent its recommendation for the fishery in the Baltic Sea in 2024 to the Commission . In the document attached, the BSAC covers the following topics: 1. Progress on sustainable fishing 2.
1. EU fisheries management should, for stocks with populations above or around MSYBtrigger, normally aim to set fishing opportunities at levels corresponding to half the estimated Fmsy instead of maximizing extraction.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.