22 submissions from 22 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 61 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 22 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
4 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 7 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 4Civil society 7Public authorities, academia, other 11
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 31 Aug 2021 — it ran from 9 Jun 2021.
Policy area
Maritime & fisheries (DG MARE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Commission reference
COM(2021)279
How it got here
Communication31 Aug 2021
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.
The reduction in fishing activity for the western Mediterranean (17.5 %) has a strong impact on the economic viability of the sector’s businesses and on employment in the sector. Continuing to reduce fishing activity and further limiting this activity undermines the survival of many farms. What is proposed to protect and safeguard companies and employed seafarers?
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Thank you firstly... its absolutely imperative the maximum amount of fish that fishers can take out of the sea without compromising the regeneration and future productivity of the stock is under inspection and acknowledged as needing be implemented especially with a governing body as yourselves setting out these initiatives which can form part of the sustainable approach going forward across the EU ..
Please find below the points set out in the “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL, referring in particular to the situation of fisheries in the Mediterranean. A 17.5 % reduction in fishing effort in the Western Mediterranean has not been a dampening exercise, a further limitation would lead to other serious difficulties which are difficult to quantify: Who will bear the losses…
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The European Commission - DG MARE (the Commission) is seeking feedback on the implementation of the common fisheries policy “towards more sustainable fishing in the EU,” including progress in: -achieving sustainable fisheries -assessing the state of fish stocks -balancing fleet capacity and fishing opportunities. It also launches a public consultation on fixing fishing opportunities for 2022.
The Platform of Portuguese NGOs on Fisheries (PONG-Pesca) welcomes the Commission’s report on the state of play and orientations for fishing opportunities in 2022 and deplores the confirmation that overfishing has increased in EU waters. Given the urgency of the situation remedial measures to restore certain fish stocks will not suffice in themselves so long as quotas are set unsustainably.
ANP|WWF welcomes the EC’s report yet deplores the confirmation that overfishing has increased in EU waters. If “fisheries in the EU grow in sustainability”, they aren’t all doing so at a pace reflecting the urgency of the situation, or at all, and remedial measures to restore certain fish stocks will not suffice in themselves so long as quotas are set unsustainably.
Hi Bass to stay 2 fish pr day @ 42 cms. But longer 01/03 to 31/12 each year. Please stop “Channel Islands commercial Fishman focal point of constant netting of gutters “. These gutters act like motor way for fish to enter and exit feeding area. Netting is allowed to close off gutters as often as commercial want. Taking every fish that passes through the gutter.
For our detailed position, please refer to the joint-NGO feedback submitted by Oceana (attached). WWF welcomes the EC’s report yet deplores the confirmation that overfishing has increased in EU waters. If “fisheries in the EU grow in sustainability”, they aren’t all doing so at a pace reflecting the urgency of the situation, or at all, and remedial measures to restore certain fish stocks will not suffice in…
The 17.5 % reduction for the western Mediterranean was very substantial and not dampening. A further limitation would cause other serious inconvenience which is difficult to quantify, but certainly has a significant negative impact on fishing companies and their embarked. They will bear the burden of losses, in terms of income, employment, presence in the territory, offer to the consumer, etc.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
As the main EU fishing region, Galicia would like to draw attention to the following points of the Communication on the state of play of the CFP and the guidelines for 2022: 1.We emphasise the recognition of the good status of fisheries in the North-East Atlantic, which almost reaches Maximum Sustainable Yield in 2021.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Please find attached a reply from the Baltic Sea Advisory Council (BSAC). The feedback letter is signed by the BSAC Executive Committee Chair, on behalf of the BSAC. The BSAC comprises organisations which represent the fisheries as well as other interest groups affected by the CFP.
SUMMARY 1. Management has not been successful in the Baltic. 2. To take account of uncertainty in the scientific assessments, the Commission should propose TACs in line with F-lower for stocks assessed as being in good shape; for others, TACs should by 50% of Fmsy. 3.
Please find our full contribution in the file attached. Abstract: Feedback on behalf of BirdWatch Ireland, ClientEarth, Danmarks Naturfredningsforening, Deutsche Umwelthilfe, Ecologistas en Acción - Spain, The Fisheries Secretariat, Fundació ENT, De Nederlandse Elasmobranchen Vereniging, Stichting De Noordzee, Oceana, Our Fish, Sciaena, Seas At Risk, and WWF.
This MEDAC advice has been adopted by consensus by the EXCOM members. Ref.:142/2021 Rome, 29 July 2021 MEDAC Advice Referring to DG MARE Ref. Ares(2021)4143172 – 24/06/2021 reply letter to MEDAC discussion paper “Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) in Mediterranean fisheries management.
On the Spanish Mediterranean coastline, the multiannual plan for the western Mediterranean primarily affects the bottom trawling fleet by means of the progressive reduction applied to fishing days. In general and in particular on the coast of Catalonia (north of GSA6 and south of GSA7), the trawl fleet carries out daily trips of less than 12 hours, making daily sales at official auctions where the catches are fully…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The EU fisheries policy for the Mediterranean must be comprehensively revised and a greater overall vision is needed. Strict studies have shared how the situation of the stocks in the Mediterranean is complete and how the indicators are strongest influenced by hidden variables linked to the overall conditions of the fishing effort of all states, specifically non-EU states.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The Communication from the Commission to the Parliament and the Council sets out the main orientations for the preparation of the proposals on fishing opportunities for 2022. While the CFP is based on three pillars: Environmental, economic and social, it seems that the Commission forgets everyone and focuses only on stocks and the need to reduce fishing mortality.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The Association of Women in the Fishing of Almeria GALATEA wants a balanced sea that allows both the healthy fishing grounds and the traditional activity of our fishers and families, which underpin our community, but the current EC measures in the multiannual plan for demersal fisheries (MAP WestMED) are a tremendous mistake, as well as failing to achieve the MSY objective by 2025, which if it will be achieved is to…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The Spanish fisheries sector calls for the political responsibility of the Spanish fisheries sector to prevent the EU from making a new mistake in the implementation of the fisheries policy in the Mediterranean. There is an urgent need for real and positive messages from the European institutions to be sent to fishermen in order to regain trust in Europe.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The first objective of the Common Fisheries Policy is to achieve environmental, but also economic and social sustainability. With the current wording of the Western Mediterranean MAP and its implementation in Spain, there is a serious risk that MSY will not be reached by the given date, but if it destroys economically and socially not only trawling, if not much of our catching sector.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The West Med plan entered into force in 2019-2020, in a context of a health crisis which has weakened the sector. The measures applied in France are important and impacting on our fleet of about sixty trawlers. For example, 2 areas representing 6.000 km² or 50 % of the Gulf of Lion area are closed between 6 and 8 months a year to protect juveniles and broodstock.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The sea has always been a notable human food reserve. Over the last few decades, fishing has undergone major changes dictated by human-oriented economic policies. The need to protect certain marine species is important for the marine ecosystem. Fishing must be carried out by monitoring the fish currently possible and the European Union must take swift action.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.