Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
17
files engaged
of 583 tracked
19
positions filed
in those 583 files
4.3
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters (review) · Review of energy labelling requirements for solid fuel boilers

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters (review)

Australian Air Quality Group · filed 14 Dec 2023 · source

Residential burning with solid fuels is the predominant source of health and climate damaging pollutants. The sector is responsible for 58% of fine particles (PM2.5), 37% of black carbon (BC) and 85% of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) emitted in the EU [1]. This is despite only a small proportion of households heating with wood.

European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) · filed 14 Dec 2023 · source

The European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) welcome the revision of the ecodesign requirements for solid fuel space heaters and the opportunity to provide feedback to the decision-making process. The key messages we would like to emphasise are as follows: 1. The health community should be consulted on relevant product policies 2.

Review of energy labelling requirements for solid fuel boilers

European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) · filed 15 Dec 2023 · source

The European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) welcome the revision of the ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers and the opportunity to provide feedback to the decision-making process. The key messages we would like to emphasise are as follows: 1. The health community should be consulted on relevant product policies 2.

Australian Air Quality Group · filed 21 Dec 2023 · source

The Call for Evidence explains: solid fuel boilers remain significant contributors to energy consumption, greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions. Pollution, mostly from particulate matter, is very high in densely populated areas with a large share of solid fuel boilers, amplifying the threat to public health.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.