Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Cefic welcomes the opportunity to take part in this Commission Roadmap and to contribute to the discussions on access to justice in environmental matters. Further to the targeted changes to the EU Aarhus Regulation and other new initiatives on access to justice in environmental matters presented in the Roadmap at hand, Cefic would like to provide to the Commission the following feedback: Targeted changes to the EU…
One initiative that leads to the practical possibility of access to justice at EU level for everything that is inherent in the legality of decisions taken with an impact on the environment is... A MUST! Apart from the two specific requests for amendment of the Aarhus Convention set out in your document, which are very technical requests, we would point out here that the AARHUS Convention is completely unknown to…
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The legislative proposal creates an unparalleled administrative review mechanism accessible only to a specific stakeholder category. To ensure consistency with the EU Treaty system of legal remedies, it is of crucial importance that applicants under the Aarhus Regulation should only be admitted to request reviews of acts not entailing implementing measures.
The Italian ElectroSensitive Association (IEA) supports this initiative, which must help achieve the European Green Deal with the main objective of reducing consumers’ energy bills and improving the EU’s security of supply by reducing primary energy consumption and reducing energy imports. Current ecodesign and energy labelling legislation has reduced the energy consumption of electronic displays.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Cefic supports the Commission Services in removing any reference to chemicals in Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays, as they are better addressed under the proposed Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.