Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

API
APICER

Industry association · Portugal

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
CU
Cerame-Unie

Industry association · Belgium

10
files engaged
of 583 tracked
11
positions filed
in those 583 files
4.5
declared FTE
self-declared
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €400K+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (2)

Migration limits for lead, cadmium and possibly other metals from ceramic and vitreous food contact materials · Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Migration limits for lead, cadmium and possibly other metals from ceramic and vitreous food contact materials

APICER · filed 26 Jun 2019 · source

In relation to the proposed roadmap we highlight some key issues that we believe should be taken into account by the European Commission: I. The document lacks critical definitions of (1) limit values; (2) Legislative scope and (3) test method. What are the definitions of traditional, artisanal and culturally valuable products and (4) what will be the derogations for these product categories?

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

Cerame-Unie · filed 26 Jun 2019 · source

The European Federation of Ceramic Table- and Ornamentalware (FEPF) welcomes the start of the “Impact Assessment on migration limits for lead, cadmium, and possibly other metals from ceramic and vitreous food contact materials”, with an inception impact assessment. We believe it is an important and necessary step, in order to assess the framework of the impact assessment.

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

APICER · filed 17 Nov 2021 · source

The Portuguese Association of Ceramic and Crystalaria Industries supports the overall objective of the GSP to help developing countries achieve sustainable development through trade, while promoting values. universal, labour standards, environmental protection and good governance.

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

Cerame-Unie · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

The European Ceramic Industry Association (Cerame-Unie) would like to thank the Commission for the opportunity to submit its feedback on the proposal for the new Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) Regulation. The ceramic industry upholds the Commission’s goal to assist developing countries in achieving sustainable development by means of trade through preferential tariffs.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.