Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2021/0297(COD) · In Force

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

17 submissions from 16 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 529 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 17 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee INTARapporteur Bernd Lange (S&D)
  1. Published in the Official Journal · 22 Jun 2026
  2. Publication in the Official Journal · 22 Jun 2026
  3. Signature by the President of the EP and by the President of the Council · 17 Jun 2026
  4. Signed · 17 Jun 2026
  5. Voting result REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on applying a generalised scheme of tariff preferences and repealing Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 - Adoption of the legislative act - 4175th meeting of the COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (Foreign Affairs (Trade)) 22 May 2026, Brussels · 26 May 2026

Who showed up

12 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations; 5 from public authorities, academia and others.

Industry 12Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 5

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

11 of 16
in the EU Register
56
full-time lobbying staff
€4.0M+
declared costs a year
28
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 19 Nov 2021 — it ran from 23 Sept 2021.

Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
INTA
Commission reference
COM(2021)579

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep10 Jun 2019
  2. Public consultation15 Jul 2020
  3. Proposal for a regulation19 Nov 2021

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 17 of 17 submissions.

C

COLEACP

· · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

The Europe-Africa-Caribbean-Pacific Liaison Committee (COLEACP) thanks the European Commission for the opportunity to contribute to this consultation process on behalf of our members. COLEACP is a not-for-profit interprofessional association representing the interests of Africa-Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) producers/exporters and EU importers of fruit, vegetables, flowers and plants.

LinkedInX
IF

Institute for European Environmental Policy

· · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

IEEP welcomes the new GSP proposal, yet, we identify key areas in need of more concrete provisions to ensure environmental protection and the promotion of more sustainable trade. Consult the attached document for detailed feedback.

LinkedInX
CE

CEFS - European Association of Sugar Manufacturers

· · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

CEFS welcomes the new legislative proposal for the new EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) for the period 2024-2034 adopted by the Commission on 22 September 2021. In our assessment, the proposal moves to the right direction, especially when it comes to the introduction of more international conventions to be respected/ratified by the beneficiaries as well as to the introduction of a rapid withdrawal…

LinkedInX
CU

Cerame-Unie - the European Ceramic Industry Association

· · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

The European Ceramic Industry Association (Cerame-Unie) would like to thank the Commission for the opportunity to submit its feedback on the proposal for the new Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) Regulation. The ceramic industry upholds the Commission’s goal to assist developing countries in achieving sustainable development by means of trade through preferential tariffs.

LinkedInX
AE

AEGIS Europe

· · filed 19 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

AEGIS Europe welcomes the fact that the proposal of the new EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences for the period 2024-2034 includes new provisions linking the tariff preference withdrawal with violations of environmental and good governance international conventions and to extend this negative conditionality also to standard GSP countries.

LinkedInX
PT

Pakistan Textile Council

· · filed 18 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

Pakistan Textile Council (PTC) is a not-for-profit public limited company set up to serve as a research and advocacy platform for Pakistan’s textile and apparel sector. Textiles is the largest export sector for Pakistan and a key engine for the economy. PTC is sponsored by 25 of the largest, most progressive textile and apparel manufacturers in Pakistan.

LinkedInX

CIBE (International Confederation of European Beet Growers) expresses its support for the current revision of the EU GSP scheme and the parallel revision of the scope of the TSD chapter ambitions. CIBE takes note that the GSP, the GSP+ special incentive, and the EPAs (Economic Partnership Agreements) have been considered as instruments of economic development for partner countries.

LinkedInX
A

APICER

· · filed 17 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

The Portuguese Association of Ceramic and Crystalaria Industries supports the overall objective of the GSP to help developing countries achieve sustainable development through trade, while promoting values. universal, labour standards, environmental protection and good governance.

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FE

Freshfel Europe

· · filed 16 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

Freshfel Europe, the European Fresh Fruits & Vegetables Association, would like the welcome the proposal adopted by the Commission for a new EU Generalised Scheme of Preferences, particularly in regards to the inclusion of environmental sustainability considerations and the need to keep safeguards to protect European production.

LinkedInX
FO

Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry (FESI)

· · filed 15 Nov 2021 · source

PDF

The Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry (FESI) welcomes the European Commission’s proposal to renew the Generalised Scheme of Preferences Regulation (GSP). FESI firmly believes that the GSP, including the GSP+ and EBA regimes, contributes to the competitiveness of products from and to the sustainable development of developing countries and has proven to help the latter becoming more competitive…

LinkedInX
TD

Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP)

· · filed 5 Nov 2021 · source

1. Transition period for temporary withdrawal of GSP+ arrangement: It is felt that the proposed regulation should clearly specify a minimum transition period for implementation of the temporary withdrawal procedure for GSP+ arrangement in the case of non-conformance to binding undertakings (Article 15).

LinkedInX
ET

European Tyre and Rubber Manufacturers' Association

· · filed 10 Jun 2019 · source

PDF

The European Tyre & Rubber Manufacturers Association (ETRMA) and its members count around 4.300 companies in the EU employing directly 360.000 people. ETRMA tyre corporate companies represent globally 59% of world sales and 7 out of 10 world leaders are our Members . We have strong presence in the EU and candidate countries with 86 tyre-producing plants and 16 R&D centres.

LinkedInX
E

EUROALLIAGES

· · filed 7 Jun 2019 · source

EUROALLIAGES is the association representing European Silicon and ferro-alloys producers. While EUROALLIAGES very much supports the basic principles and objectives pursued by GSP, EUROALLIAGS would like to make the following comments: - Within the overall objectives of the GSP – promotion of sustainable development of developing countries -, there was a common understanding that GSP should focus more on the…

LinkedInX
A

amfori

· · filed 7 Jun 2019 · source

In principle, the current GSP system is effective – and its development (e.g. of tariff rates) is followed closely. If it were removed, the less productive factories in GSP countries would likely be no longer competitive. This would not be in the interest of GSP countries nor of the EU wishing to favour these countries.

LinkedInX
E

ePURE

· · filed 6 Jun 2019 · source

PDF

ePURE, representing the European renewable ethanol industry, irrespective of the feedstock or the end use (fuel, industrial or beverages applications) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment ‘Towards the future Generalised Scheme of Preferences Regulation granting trade advantages to developing countries’.

LinkedInX
WS

Women's Eco-nomic and Social Think Tank - WESTT

· · filed 29 May 2019 · source

PDF

GSP is a development program, with the objective of implementing sustainable development and in the case of GSP+ a focus on good governance, amongst its other core objectives. The administration and impact of GSP should therefore be conducted by DG Development and not DG Trade, where there is a conflict of interest.

LinkedInX
CE

CEFS - European Association of Sugar Manufacturers

· · filed 22 May 2019 · source

The current GSP provides sufficient support to LDCs and developing countries. The safeguard provisions must be effective, i.e. the Commission should be able to react in a timely manner. The respect of the conventions on labour and human rights, environment and governance principles need to be better monitored. In case of violation the COM should be able to take immediate steps to withdraw tariff preferences.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 17 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.