not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
7
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 665 tracked
6
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
APICER filed 7 positions between 26 Jun 2019 and 23 Jun 2022, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
Contributos ou observações da APICER aos desafios colocados à sustentabilidade da competitividade, dos sectores que representamos, pelo Pacote Fit for 55 e em especial às Diretiva CELE/ETS, Diretiva Eficiência Energética e Diretiva das Energias Renováveis Agosto 2021 Rua Coronel Veiga Simão, Edifício C 3020-307 Coimbra Portugal T. [phone removed] F.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Comentários sobre a Proposta de um Mecanismo de Ajustamento das Fronteiras de Carbono (CBAM) A Associação Portuguesa das Indústrias da Cerâmica e da Cristalaria (APICER) gostaria de agradecer à Comissão Europeia pela oportunidade de apresentar o seu comentário sobre a proposta de Regulamento que estabelece um Mecanismo de Ajustamento das Fronteiras de Carbono ("CBAM").
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Contributos ou observações da APICER aos desafios colocados à sustentabilidade da competitividade, dos sectores que representamos, pelo Pacote Fit for 55 e em especial às Diretiva CELE/ETS, Diretiva Eficiência Energética e Diretiva das Energias Renováveis Agosto 2021 Rua Coronel Veiga Simão, Edifício C 3020-307 Coimbra Portugal T. [phone removed] F.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
APICER, the Portuguese Association of Ceramic Industries and Cristalaria, is grateful for your opportunity to participate in this public consultation and thus to present our comments on the document. We have thus prepared a document divided into several chapters: — Overall assessment of the document; — Positive aspects; — General aspects of concern to us; — Specific points of concern for the ceramics industry, in…
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
In the context of the Public Consultation of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), the Portuguese associations representing the extractive and manufacturing sector — Cluster of Mineral Resources, ANIET, APICER and ASSIMAGRA — are therefore submitting their comments, as reflected in the attached joint and concerted participation document.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
In relation to the proposed roadmap we highlight some key issues that we believe should be taken into account by the European Commission: I. The document lacks critical definitions of (1) limit values; (2) Legislative scope and (3) test method. What are the definitions of traditional, artisanal and culturally valuable products and (4) what will be the derogations for these product categories?
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
The Portuguese Association of Ceramic and Crystalaria Industries supports the overall objective of the GSP to help developing countries achieve sustainable development through trade, while promoting values. universal, labour standards, environmental protection and good governance.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put APICER next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from APICER’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
