The Changing Markets Foundation welcomes that the Commission has committed to ban the most hazardous chemicals from consumer products, including FCM, and has committed to revising the FCM legislation. We believe this is an important opportunity to establish safer and more sustainable food packaging as part of achieving a toxic-free circular economy.
Changing Markets Foundation
NGO · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 482789528099-85
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #315 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Changing Markets is a member of the following:
- Eating Better: http://www.eating-better.org
- EEB: https://eeb.org
- Food and Climate Action Group: https://www.foodandclimateaction.org/
- Climate Action Against Disinformation: https://caad.info/
- Break Free From Plastic: https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/
- EU Parliament's Sustainable Textile Working Group
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Stichting Changing Markets
- Head office
- Utrecht, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Changing in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Changing Markets Foundation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Changing Markets Foundation filed 3 positions between 4 Jun 2018 and 16 Jun 2021, across 3 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The objective of Article 9 SUPD is the seperate collection of plastic bottles in order to ensure that they don’t end up littered in the environment and the evidence shows that the only way to achieve viable and long-term 90% separate collection rates is through mandatory Deposit Return Systems.
We agree with the feedback by the European Environmental Bureau, which they have handed it (EEB proposals for a more coherent EU Product Policy Framework contributing to the Circular Economy). We have a few additions as that we have encountered as part of our campaigns, notably our campaign to increase circularity of the carpet sector.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Changing Markets Foundation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 8.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Changing Markets Foundation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.