The Austrian Federal Competition Authority refers to the opinion submitted during the public consultation on the evaluation phase of this initiative (https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14427-Public-procurement-directives-evaluation/F3521959_en), which highlighted aspects at the interface between competition law and public procurement law that should be taken into account in the…
BR
Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde
Public authority · Austria
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 687 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 687 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 687 consultation files tracked so far (60,344 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde filed 3 positions between 9 Jan 2026 and 26 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 687 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Stellungnahme der österreichischen Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde betreffend die Überarbeitung der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/633 über unlautere Handelspraktiken in den Geschäftsbeziehungen zwischen Unternehmen in der Agrar- und Lebensmittelversorgungskette Die Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde ist die für die Durchsetzung der in Artikel 3 der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/6331 (UTP-Richtlinie) festgelegten Verbote in Österreich zuständige…
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Die Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde („BWB“) begrüßt die Initiative der Europäischen Kommission, wie sie auch im nunmehr vorgelegten Call for Evidence zum Ausdruck kommt, das Problem ungerechtfertigter territorialer Lieferbeschränkungen („TSCs“) betreffend Konsumgüter des täglichen Bedarfs auf der Grundlage von Artikel 114 AEUV einer Lösung zuzuführen und spricht ihr dafür ihre nachdrückliche Unterstützung aus.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 29.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.